In the summer of 2000, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC),
a neo-conservative think tank riddled with soon to be Bush
administration officials and advisors, issued a document calling for the
radical restructuring of U.S. government and military policies.
It
advocated the massive expansion of defense spending, the re-invasion of
Iraq, the military and economic securing of Afghanistan and Central
Asia, increased centralized power and funds for the CIA, FBI, and NSA,
among a slew of other policies that would, in the near future, be
enacted upon their ascension to power. In the same document, they cite a
potential problem with their plan.
Referring to the goals of
transforming the U.S. and global power structure, the paper states that
because of the American Public's slant toward ideas of democracy and
freedom, "this process of transformation is likely to be a long one,
absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl
Harbor."
PNAC members, and signers to its policy documents, include: Dick
Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wofowitz, Jeb Bush, Richard Perle, John
Bolton, Scooter Libby, Elliot Abrams, Richard Armitage, William Bennet,
William Kristol, and Zalmy Khalilzad.
All men with their hands deep in the
private defense, oil, and multi-national corporate industries poised to
make vast sums of money and secure huge tracts of power and influence if
PNAC policy evolved into U.S. Government policy. Nine months after
they rose to power, and assumed central positions of leadership up and
down the spectrum of military, civilian, domestic, and international
agencies, they got their New Pearl Harbor.
PNAC policy evolved into the Bush Administration's official agenda. This absouletly establishes motive.
In September 2000 - one year
before 9-11 - the Project for a New American Century (Richard Perle,
Paul Wolfowitz, etc.) - issued a paper, "Rebuilding America's Defenses,"
calling for an increased U.S. military presence in the Middle East.
But, it warned, the "transformation ...is likely to be a long one,
absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl
Harbor." In May 2001, as the 9-11 countdown began
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders
of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple
matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist
dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no
voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked,
and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the
country to greater danger."
— Herman Goering, second in command of the Third Reich, at the Nuremberg trials
Governmental Cover Up
Able Danger
is one egregious individual example. In August of 2005, Army
Intelligence Officer Lt. Colonel Anthony Shaffer went public with
information that he told staff members of the 9/11 Commission that he
was part of a military unit that identified Mohammed Atta, and three
other alleged 9/11 hijackers, a full year before the September 11
attacks. But military lawyers stepped in at the time and "stopped the
unit from sharing the information with the FBI.
Why would high-level Pentagon officials not want information regarding terrorist suspects and details of their hijacking plot to be shared with the FBI?
For his efforts to bring the disturbing news of Able Danger to
light, Lt. Colonel Shaffer, a 23-year decorated veteran, was fired,
publicly humiliated, stripped of his pension, and had a legal gag order
placed on his right to speak out to the public and Congress.
Building 7
Professor Jones' meticulous research explains why no other steel
frame building, in the history of the world, has ever suffered a total collapse anywhere on the planet
before or after 9/11 due to fire.
Never FORGET that Building 7 was NOT hit by
an aircraft). Including WTC 4, 5, and 6, which were more intensely
pelted by debris from the Twin Towers' collapse, and had fires of equal, or GREATER,
intensity burning for many more hours than the adjacent Building 7. (For
more examples of other intense high-rise building fires that did not cause collapse, click here or here.
Jones specifically references the fire at the Windsor Building in Madrid, Spain in February of 2005, which did not result in total structural collapse. This 32-story high rise burned fiercely
for 20 hours, with flames shooting hundreds of feet into the air,
gutting the entire building. And while significantly more severe than
the fires of Building 7, which burned for only a few hours on only a few
floors, the Windsor Building flames did not bring the building down.
The damage from the fire did produce a partial collapse, and this
collapse behaved exactly in line with the laws of physics and nature. Part
of the building fell in an isolated collapse into the street below,
leaving a huge, gaping wound in the middle of the high-rise with exposed
rebar and debris hanging hundreds of feet into the air. The inferno
did not produce a symmetrical, straight down, box-like, virtual
free-fall total collapse witnessed in the fall of Building 7.
Strategically planted, well-timed explosive devices are what weaken
steel symmetrically and create coordinated downward implosions. Not
random fires scattered throughout a building.
Another, and perhaps stronger, piece of evidence for controlled
demolition of Building 7 is the speed at which the structure fell. It
was a 576-foot tall building, and a conservative estimate of available
video evidence shows that it fell in 6.5 seconds. A marble, with
nothing but wind resistance in its path, would fall to the ground from
the same height in roughly 6 seconds. Somehow, the top of this building
fell to the ground in a perfectly symmetrical downward trajectory, with
47 floors of steel, concrete, and thousands of tons of upright standing
debris in its path providing huge amounts of vertical
resistance, at virtually free-fall speed.
Allegedly because of random
fires on a few floors. This is a physical and mathematical
impossibility, violating laws in the conservation of momentum covered at
length in this paper by Dr. Kenneth Kuttler here.
Make no mistake...9-11 was not carried out by poor, uneducated, middle eastern religious zealots with box cutters. 9-11 was carried out by rouge elements within the United States military-intelligence apparatus. The bloodiest attack on American soil was perpetrated to further military control of the worlds energy supplies, in one word, oil.
If America was to remain the world's only super power in the new century it had to secure the world's largest concentration of oil deposits. Couple that with the Globalists plans for a one world government and you have the second part to 9-11, removing freedom, independence, and eviscerating the Bill of Rights.
The creation of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) which is the precursor to the Federal police force.
The creation the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2002, a cabinet-level office that merged 22 government agencies under the control of one man.
The Patriot Act was the first of many changes to surveillance laws that
made it easier for the government to spy on ordinary Americans by
expanding the authority to monitor phone and email communications,
collect bank and credit reporting records, and track the activity of
innocent Americans on the Internet. While most Americans think it was
created to catch terrorists, the Patriot Act specifically created for the surveillance of US
citizens.
The
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which created a secret court,
was amended in both 2001 lowering the legal bar for the
government to engage in wiretapping and other surveillance practices,
This allowed the NSA to go from spying on foreign governments and foreign terrorists to one
that NOW tracks communications of American citizens without a warrant.
Never take anything on face value. Question EVERYTHING! Then, do the research, be relentless in your search for the truth. Look for yourself with an open mind. If you wish to know more, about the 9-11 cover up, take time and listen to the EXPERTS below. Through, science and logic they will take you through real world 9-11 FACTS. Pick any of the links below and read irrefutable scientific proofs concerning 9-11, which are not open to supposition or political ideology.
Physics and mathematics do not lie.
