The Death kneel of FRANCE

 

The Death of France begun five decades ago. In the 1960s, after the war in Algeria, President Charles de Gaulle directed the country toward closer relations with Arab and Muslim states.

Migratory flows of "guest workers(muslims)" from Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia, which had started a few years earlier, sharply increased. Immigrants were not encouraged to integrate. Everyone assumed they would return home at the end of their employment contracts. They were settled in the outskirts of big cities. The economy was dynamic, with strong job creation. All seemed well on the surface, but the French did not understand islam. The French could not comprehend the virulent spread of muslims like cancer across France at a rate not seen since the black death.  

Twenty years later the contagion of islam and it's corrosive effects became painfully obvious. The unchecked muslim immigrants now numbered in the millions. muslims from sub-Saharan Africa joined those coming from Arab nations.  Neighborhoods made up of just Arabs and Africans were stealthy  formed. The economy had slowed down and massive unemployment settled in. Because of French social spending the jobless muslims did not go back home, instead relying on social benefits. 

 

 Although many of these new arrivals had become French citizens, they were  resentful of France and the West. Political agitators started teaching them to attack and destroy Western civilization. Violent gangs of young Arabs and Africans began to intimidate the police. Clashes with police were common. Often, when a gang member was wounded, political agitators would help to incite more violence.

Because the French had no backbone the situation swiftly spun out of control.  

In 1984, a movement called SOS Racisme was created by Trotskyist militants, and began to define any criticism of immigration as "racist". Major leftist parties supported SOS Racism. They learned from the American Democrats that by accusing their political opponents of racism, they could attract the votes of blacks and muslims.  The presence of Islamist agitators, alongside agitators in Arab and African neighborhoods, plus the emergence of anti-Western Islamic discourse, alarmed many observers. SOS Racisme immediately declared that ANY  who spoke against muslims and blacks were both Islamophobic and racists.

 

In 1990, a law drafted by a Communist lawmaker, Jean-Claude Gayssot, was passed. It stipulated that "any discrimination based on ethnicity, nation, race or religion is prohibited." Since then, this law has been used to criminalize and SILENCE any criticism of Arab and African delinquency, any question on immigration from the Muslim world, any negative analysis of Islam. Many writers have been fined, and most "politically incorrect" books on those topics have disappeared from bookshops. This is FASCISM in it's rawest form.

The French government demanded the media to obey the "Gayssot law." It also had FRENCH history textbooks be rewritten to include chapters on the crimes committed by the West against Muslims, and on the "essential contribution" of Islam to humanity.  So, not only was FRENCH history being re-written, absolute lies about the contribution of islam to FRANCE was added as well.

 

In 2002, the situation in the country became dramatic.

Arab and African neighborhoods had NOW become "no-go zones." Radical Islam was widespread and Islamist attacks began. Dozens of cars would be torched each week. Muslim anti-Semitism was rising rapidly and led to an increase in anti-Jewish attacks. SOS Racisme and other anti-racist organizations were silent on Muslim anti-Semitism. Unwilling to be accused of "Islamophobic racism," organizations tasked with fighting against anti-Semitism were beaten into submission. islamic FEAR is the new political language in FRANCE.  Just like in every other country that islam has infiltrated VIOLENCE is the only thing islam has to contribute. 

A book, The Lost Territories of the Republic, by Georges Bensoussan (under the pen-name "Emmanuel Brenner"), was released. It depicted accurately what was going on. It spoke of the sweeping hatred for the West among young people of muslim origin, and of the full-blown hatred of Jews among young Muslims. It said that "no-go zones" were on the edge of secession and no longer a part of French territory. The mainstream media out of FEAR of muslim reprisals deliberately ignored the book.

Three years later, in October 2005, riots broke out across the country. More than 9,000 cars were torched by muslims. Hundreds of stores, supermarkets and shopping centers were looted and destroyed by muslims. Dozens of police officers were seriously injured by muslims. See a pattern developing?

 The violent uprising of muslims in FRANCE only stopped when the government begged for an agreement to make peace with Muslim associations. 

Today in 2017 FRANCE as a western nation has fallen.  All Democratic power in FRANCE has now been surrendered to the barbaric hoards of muslim invaders. islam, is a festering disease, which knows only one word...violence.    

 

France's one last hope is Marine Le Pen’s Front National.  She is running for a leadership role in Frances government. The globalists want her dead. She is the last French politician with the will to stand against the total islamic overthrow of France. She is also 100% for Frances exit from the European Union.  As you can imagine her life is in great danger...

obama should be indicted

 

 

Obama and his Department of Justice maliciously and criminally misused the FISA process to collect intelligence on Presidential candidate Donald J. Trump. Additionally, Obama personally relaxed the limitations on how such information collected could be disseminated in the weeks before leaving office.

 

The political ramifications from this, if proved correct, could be unprecedented in scope. Once fully exposed, it would explain the curious actions of Obama as he prepared to vacate the White House. It would also explain, in context, the actions and statements of not only Barack Hussein Obama, but others in key positions of power including Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, John Brennan, and others within the media.

Obama’s insistence to secure a federal wiretap warrant of Donald J. Trump, the candidate, using the federal court system as the mechanism to do so. The ostensible probable cause was alleged ties between Donald J. Trump and/or his associates with Russia.

The first warrant application was made in June 2016, according to reports published by The New York Times and elsewhere, but was rejected due to the lack of probable cause of criminal activity.

When the request was denied in regular federal court, Obama and his Justice Department attempted an “end around” by citing the existence of a “foreign actor” and made a similar surveillance warrant application through the more specialized Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court in October of 2016. According to published reports, that warrant application was rejected as well, a rare occurrence in the FISA venue, which strengthens claims that no evidence of any foreign involvement ever existed. It has been reported that the initial warrant application to the FISA court specifically named Donald J. Trump.

It is also relevant to note here that this is the type of activity that led to the creation of the infamous “Wall” that was referenced after the 9/11 attacks. Its relevance to this specific instance is explained well by former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy in this January 11, 2017 column.

Apparently undeterred, the Obama Justice Department submitted yet another application to the FISA court, this time omitting the name of Donald J. Trump and submitting it as a FISA specific case. The FISA court reportedly approved the application under the new and more narrow scope. Specifically, ties to two Russian banks: Russia’s SV bank and Alfa Bank. The alleged target was a computer server reportedly situated inside the Trump Tower.
Based on the lack of action consequential to that warrant and wiretap, it has been stated (and can be reasonably determined) that no actionable evidence was found.



Shortly before leaving office, Obama expanded the power of the National Security Agency (NSA) as detailed in the unclassified document titled Procedures for the Availability or Dissemination of Raw Signals Intelligence Information by the National Security Agency (NSA). As detailed in that document, limitations were changed on what the NSA could do with the information they collected through their surveillance operations. These changes effectively relaxed the restrictions on the dissemination of information collected on private citizens by broadening the access to such information.
It is also notable that on January 3, 2017, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed off on rule changes for phone taps.

 

It appears that President Trump has been provided the evidence of a paper trail leading to a FISA court that substantiates his assertions that Barack Hussein Obama, working in concert with others including those wielding the full might and power of various federal agencies, improperly obtained authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign under the pretense of a national security investigation, and continued such monitoring beyond its tenuous scope even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found.
This is as serious as it gets.



repost:http://canadafreepress.com/article/this-is-as-serious-as-it-gets?utm