Snopes.com Liberal Propaganda

The founder of the far left leaning, liberal 'fact-checking' website Snopes David Mikkelson embezzled $98,000 in company funds; using it to spend on personal expenses which included sex toys, and hiring Tranny prostitutes. This is  according to Barbara Mikkelson, David Mikkelson's x-wife, in legal documents filed during their divorce.

This is the same Snopes.com supposed fact-checking website which which was recently chosen by left leaning Facebook as one of their four “fact-check” organizations patrolling the site for “fake news, which is code word for anything that is not Democratic party propaganda. 

After divorcing from his first wife, Barbara Mikkelson, David Mikkelson married Elyssa Young, an over weight former porn star and current escort who now works for Snopes as an administrator.  Neither the founder of Snopes, the current administrator has a journalism degree, law enforcement credentials, nor ANY investigatory training experience. The entirely of Snopes fact checking is founder David Mikkelson  goggling information and then passing it off as fact checking.  

above pic:“fact-checker” Kim LaCapria

What passes at Snopes as a top “fact-checker” Kim LaCapria claimed on her personal blog that she has “posted to Snopes” blasted out of her mind after smoking marijuana. LaCapria describes herself as proudly and openly left-leaning liberal. She also claimed that Republicans fear women in authority.  Snopes almost exclusively employs leftists as fact-checkers, many of whom have exhibited a clear distaste for Americans and more specifically Republican voters. There is not a single Snopes fact-checker who comes from a conservative background.

Liberal organizations who have been paying Snopes.com to debunk stories that cast them in a bad light, while validating damaging half-truths and rumors about their political opponents.

Having established their website as a reputable resource for validating and debunking stories in American popular culture since 1995, the Mikkelson couple soon found themselves in a position to influence public discourse by punishing or rewarding certain cultural and political biases. 

Before long they were accepting money to promote some rumors and downplay or completely ignore some others, which over the years have brought them millions of dollars, according to the source.

Especially scandalous may be the website's possible collaboration with left-leaning national media organizations, which started with payments to Snopes.com to overlook or validate their inaccurate and biased reporting, and eventually evolved into a full-scale coordinated effort with left-leaning groups and public relation firms to construct a media narrative that gave legitimacy to certain opinions, political causes and public figures, while discrediting other opinions, causes, and public figures.

Several watchdog groups have already condemned Snopes.com as a corrupt organization with zero credibility and urged the public to disregard any political 'fact-checking' from this tainted source.