Thursday, November 21, 2013

Newly elected Socialist in the Seattle city council

Meet Kshama Sawant,a newly elected Socialist candidate to the  Seattle city council.

The Workers Should Take Over the Factory! Seattle Discovers Electing a Socialist Has Consequences
 Seattle machinists for Boeing rejected a deal that would reduce pensions for union members in return for Boeing staying in Everett, Wash., building 777X Boeing airliners for the next eight years.

 Kshama Sawant 's response to Boeing was to tell the Boeing machinists that they, 'The Workers' should take over the factories, and shut down Boeing’s profit-making machine!' Kshama Sawant said this publicly to a group of activists in the city’s Westlake Park.

 Boeing, as is their Democratic right as private business owners, is considering taking those jobs elsewhere. 

Kshama Sawant 's response to Boeing  was declare this economic business decision 'Economic Terrorism!'  She says that it's going to devastate the state’s economy.”  

Sawant whipped the crowd into a frenzy shouting.." If Boeing tries to move out," Sawant said," union workers should simply take over the Everett airplane-building factory."

She referred to this as “democratic ownership.”
“The only response we can have if Boeing executives do not agree to keep the plant here is for the machinists to say the machines are here, the workers are here, we will do the job, we don’t need the executives. The executives don’t do the work, the machinists do,” she said.

She said that once workers take over the plant, they should start building things everyone can use.
“We can re-tool the machines to produce mass transit like buses, instead of destructive, you know, war machines."


This is the absolute lunacy fantasy world the far left live in.  A world where if they don't like something they can just make up scary sounding terms to justify state sanctioned socialism.   Boeing, asked the workers to concede small financial points, which in this unstable down economy is a sound business decision.  Kshama Sawant, not liking this will call it economic terrorism, and to her and the loony left, this will somehow justify the outright theft of materials, land, and intellectual copyright.

In what world do the workers have the right to put aside the US Constitution and all laws of commerce and just appropriate other peoples property.   The real mind bender is  Kshama Sawant, first says that Boeing leaving would devastate the Seattle economy.  That Boeing should be made to stay so the economy won't suffer, that Boeing is a needed employer to the Seattle area.   Yet, once Boeing intimates that it may leave the Seattle area suddenly they are a big bad maker of war machines.    Kshama Sawant was fine with Boeing as long as Boeing kept the money flowing into her constituents pockets.   Typical far left adolescent mind set, if they don't get a free ride and everything their way, they result to name calling and smear tactics.

Please tell me  in your fantasy world where magical elves throw fairy dust into the air and suddenly the Boeing machinists are able to STEAL Boeing's Everett airplane-building factory, property, grounds, and intellectual property rights. 

Who will  be paying the property taxes?  How are the Seattle machinist going to pay Boeing for the $250,000,000 worth of tooling machines at the Boeing property?  How will the Seattle machinist pay for the software license which run the tooling machines?  What about the State and Federal taxes that are due for the Boeing plant?    What about the State and Federal aviation license which must be approved by government regulators.  What about the massive insurance needed to cover the Boeing plant while it is operational.  What about the funding for the Union pensions, who will be paying that?  Here's another silly thing, what about the budget for salaries, utilities, maintenance to the plant, grounds, vehicles, the 100's of machines,and on and on and on....

It seems that Kshama Sawant lives in the same fantasy world as this guy


Boeing...



Friday, November 15, 2013

Executive Power is NOT Imperial Power


'Obamacare' is an unconstitutional law that has ZERO legislative authority. The Affordable Car Act ACA was ruled to be a tax by the Supreme Court. The ACA bill was introduced in the Senate. Only the House can introduce a bill that is a tax. Null and void. Its all true, don't believe me look it up. Sissel v. United States Department of Health & Human Services.

The president came out in the press yesterday and stated that He would change the law so that voters could keep their insurance.  The Executive Branch has ZERO legal authority to change ANYTHING in a law passed by Congress.  The president can not under the United States Constitution change a law to suit his political needs. The President doesn't even have line item veto power. 

What you saw with his deceleration that HE would change the law was the out right contempt that the Executive Branch has for the American public.

The worst part is the educated press, who KNOW BETTER, jumped on board by shouting how brilliant a decision, how wonderful that the president has it all under control.  The liberal press just clapped their hands and wrote, said, and printed how the president was taking charge and fixing the 'little hiccups in the ACA. 

 For the uneducated there are checks and balances set forth in the United States Constitution.  There is a REASON that there are 3 branch government of the United States. It's so that one branch cannot seize power and become a DICTATOR.

Supposedly, the president went to law school.  IF he actually attended law school and he doesn't know how the 3 branches of the United States government functions, then I suggest he go back to Kenya and re-read a few US Law books.

Starting with the... 

 
Article One: of the United States Constitution describes the powers of Congress, and the legislative branch of the federal government. The Article establishes the powers of and LIMITATIONS on the Congress, consisting of a House of Representatives composed of Representatives, with each state gaining or losing representation in proportion to its population, and a Senate, composed of two Senators from each state. 

The article details the manner of election and qualifications of members of each House. It outlines legislative procedure and enumerates the powers vested in the legislative branch. Finally, it establishes limits on the powers of both Congress and the states.


Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Quantitative Easing he greatest Bank Robbery by Wall Street of all time

Andrew Huszar that helped manage the Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing program during 2009 and 2010 is publicly apologizing for what he has done.  He says that quantitative easing has accomplished next to nothing for the average person on the street.  Instead, he says that it has been “the greatest backdoor Wall Street bailout of all time.”  And of course the cold, hard economic numbers support what Huszar is saying.  The percentage of working age Americans with a job has not improved at all during the quantitative easing era, and median household income has actually steadily declined during that time frame.  Meanwhile, U.S. stock prices have doubled overall, and the stock prices of the big Wall Street banks have tripled.  So who benefits from quantitative easing?

After the first round of quantitative easing ended, Huszar says that it was incredibly obvious that Quantitative Easing had done very little to benefit average Americans but that it had been “an absolute financial windfall for Wall Street”…

The Federal Reserve was created by the Wall Street bankers for the benefit of Wall Street bankers.  When the Federal Reserve serves the interests of Wall Street period, end of story. If by some miracle, one or two, middle class people benefit by getting jobs as janitors or parking lot attendants, then Wall street feels it's done its job to help middle America.  


Quantitative easing has been one giant Free ride for Wall Street banks…


Having racked up hundreds of billions of dollars in opaque Fed subsidies, U.S. banks have seen their collective stock price triple since March 2009. The largest Banking cartels: 0.2% of 1 percent now control more than 70% of the U.S. bank assets.

And that number is climbing as Americans are losing their jobs at a record rate. Food stamps are at levels not seen EVER!  Americans are losing their jobs their home, their insurance WHILE the corporate oligarchs are having troubles, such as finding an island to purchase, so that they can park their new mega-yachts. 

All of that on the backs of the middle class.  The future debt for every American is growing at an unsustainable rate.  It is currently $125,000.00 and climbing fast.   All, so that Wall Street can continue to rob American taxpayers and keep it all for themselves.


Billionaire hedge fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller was recently quoted as saying about quantitative easing…

“This is fantastic for every rich person,” he said Thursday, a day after the Fed’s stunning decision to delay tightening its monetary policy. “This is the biggest redistribution of wealth from the middle class and the poor to the rich ever.“
“Who owns assets—the rich, the billionaires. You think Warren Buffett hates this stuff? You think I hate this stuff? I had a very good day yesterday.”
Druckenmiller, whose net worth is estimated at more than $2 billion, can't contain his joy at this insane windfall from US taxpayers!

The American people are still being told that quantitative easing is “economic stimulus” which will make the lives of average Americans better.

That is a flat out lie told by the  thieves at the Federal Reserve.

The Bank of England has shown conclusively that quantitative easing actually increases the gap between the wealthy and the poor…