White Farmers Being Slaughtered in South Africa

WHITE GENOCIDE IN SOUTH AFRICA

LAST month, British woman Sue Howarth and her husband Robert Lynn were woken at 2am by three men breaking into a window of their remote farm in Dullstroom, a small town in the northeast of South Africa, about 240km from the nearest capital city.

The couple, who had lived in the area for 20 years, were tied up, stabbed, and tortured with a blowtorch for several hours. The masked men stuffed a plastic bag down Mrs Howarth’s throat, and attempted to strangle her husband with a bag around his neck.

The couple were bundled into their own truck, still in their pyjamas, and driven to a roadside where they were shot. Mrs Howarth, 64, a former pharmaceutical company executive, was shot twice in the head. Mr Lynn, 66, was shot in the neck.

Miraculously he survived, and managed to flag down a passer-by early on Sunday morning. Mrs Howarth, who police said was “unrecognizable” from her injuries, had multiple skull fractures, gunshot wounds and “horrific” burns to her breasts.

“Sue was discovered amongst some trees, lying in a ditch,” writes Jana Boshoff, reporter for the local Middelburg Observer newspaper. “Her rescuers managed to find her by following her groans of pain and then noticing drag marks from the road into the field.

“Her head was covered with a towel. Her eyes were swollen shut. She was partially clothed with just scraps of her shirt remaining. Her breasts and upper body was bloody. The plastic bag, shoved down her throat, took some effort to remove because her jaw was clamped down tightly.

 

“How she managed to breathe with the bag in her throat remains a mystery. One of her rescuers later recalled how Sue was unresponsive except for the constant groaning. Whilst the man ran back to the road to see if an ambulance has not arrived yet, she managed to curl one of her arms around her breasts in a last attempt to protect herself.”

She was rushed to hospital and placed on life support, but died two days later.

 

This is happening on a daily basis in South Africa to white farmers. It is being done deliberately with forethought because the South African government sanctions the torture and murder of white farmers. There have been more than 70 attacks and around 25 murders in similar attacks on white farmers in months time. 

 

The Transvaal Agricultural Union, which represents commercial farmers, and civil rights group AfriForum.

 

According to the TAU, last year there were 345 attacks resulting in 70 deaths — the highest death toll since 2008. In 2015 there were 318 attacks resulting in 64 deaths, and the year before there were 277 attacks resulting in 67 deaths.

 

In total, between 1998 and the end of 2016, 1848 people have been murdered in farm attacks — 1187 farmers, 490 family members, 147 farm employees, and 24 people who happened to be visiting the farm at the time.

The rise in farm attacks has been blamed on increasingly anti-white hate speech, particularly from the ruling African National Congress.

 

Trying to STOP the repeal the Federal Communications Commission’s 2016 broadband privacy rules

 

Last week, on a party-line vote, the Senate voted to repeal the Federal Communications Commission’s 2016 broadband privacy rules giving consumers the power to choose how their ISPs use and share their personal data. Today, the House of Representatives will vote, and if the House also votes to repeal the rules, the bill will go to President Trump, who is expected to sign it.

The stark consequences of repeal are Orwellian: ISPs like Comcast, AT&T, and Charter WILL sell your personal information to the highest bidder. All of your personal search history, the web pages you visit, every video you watch, all of it will be the property of a corporation.  You will no longer have no say over your personal data and to whom it is sold. No one, not your Congressmen, not your Senator, not even the president will be able to protect you. 

 

The Federal Trade Commission has no legal authority to oversee ISP practices, and the bill under consideration will permanently cripple the FCC by denying it the future ability to overturn such legislation.  So, unless the bill fails, highly unlikely due to politicians being bought off by the ISP's, the nation’s strongest privacy protections will not only be eliminated, but they will be unable to be revived by the FCC.

How to stop the Draconian take over of YOUR Online Data

The life and eath struggle of American's Internet freedom is not yet lost. The House votes today! Stand up!  Tell, yell, shout, send smoke signals, faxes, telegrams, emails, phone calls, do ANYTHING to get YOUR Representatives attention.  Don’t let the Fascist Corporations rob American's of OUR hard-won protections.  

 Color of Change, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Free Press have simple ways for YOU to inform your Representative what YOU think of the FCC’s rules and Congress’ efforts to eliminate them.

The REAL reason CORRUPT New York US Attorney Preet Bharara was FIRED

Corrupt New York Senator Charles Schumer was instrumental in getting his lackey Preet Bharara appointed to the position of federal prosecutor and in return Preet was EXPECTED to do the bidding of the senator and his allies. Until recently, President Trump had no idea what was really going on. Once President Trump’s staff understood the quid pro quo, by the law of the land President Trump demanded Bharara’s immediate resignation.



In 2015, Puerto Rico (knowingly) defaulted on $70 billion in municipal bonds. Those involved panicked. There was ample evidence that the issuing agencies were technically bankrupt when they issued the bonds and that they purchased fraudulent credit ratings from Moody’s Fitch and S&P. Wall Street’s biggest banks then KNOWINGLY sold junk bonds to innocent investors, labeling them as safe investments. Everyone made a ton of money, except the innocent investors.

 

The sheer evidence of this massive criminal act was overwhelming. Nearly a hundred lawsuits and complaints to the FBI and SEC were streaming in. Dozens of Wall Street executives could go (SHOULD HAVE GONE) to prison. This was out right FRAUD and THEFT on a State scale.



The (GUILTY) Wall Street executives went to Senator Schumer and demanded two things: that no criminal investigations or prosecutions be considered and that he somehow limit the bondholders’ rights to keep them from suing.
The sheer fraud could not be hidden; congressmen and senators were made fully aware of the out right fraud that had occurred  in Puerto Rico.  Senator Schumer; owing his friends on Wallstreet  gathered, Elizabeth Warren, Senator Blumenthal and Senator Feinstein for a cover up. In January 2016, they submitted a rider to the energy bill that would prevent the bondholders from suing.  All four politicians (Should be arrested and jailed) were quickly rewarded and the Wall Street contributions poured in.

 

 US Attorney Bharara, beholden to New York Senator Charles Schumer, was tasked with making sure that ANY and ALL investigations, into the massive fraud and theft, would be sidetracked and ABSOLUTELY no prosecutions would take place. 


Even with the discovery of hundreds of  felonies related to the issuance of this $70 billion in bonds, the Department of Justice WILLFULLY ignored the evidence and sidetrack all efforts by their field agents to prosecute.  Preet Bharara was paying back his benefactor as per the agreed quid pro quo.


The four senators continued to press for a prohibition of law suits, confiscation of what was left of the $70 billion in bond proceeds and a revocation of all the bond holders’ legal rights. They got what they were hoping for in the PROMESA legislation. The politicians then went on to shape an argument that whatever money was left that was not already stolen should be given to underfunded union pensions.


The level of corruption between the bond issuers, the rating agencies, the major Wall Street banks, the DOJ and our politicians would make the mafia blush.

 

Preet Bharara was given a treasure trove of documents, testimonies, and hard evidence of the OUT RIGHT FRAUD plus over 10,000 pages of documentary evidence. Preet Bharara ignored it all, he prosecuted no one. Not one single person went to jail despite a mountain of irrefutable evidence.    A second year law student with brain damage could have convicted all parties under our current RICO statutes yet Preet Bharara knowingly looked the other way. Preet Bharara should be in prison along with his master
New York Senator Charles Schumer. 

some info from:https://www.thecaribbeanradio.com/commentary-the-real-reason-new-york-us-attorney-preet-bharara-was-asked-to-resign/

islam is a death cult

Currently, the “Swedish government is in a state of confusion after written threats appeared in several major cities in Sweden. The postings received were signed by ISIS and offering all Swedes three choices, either conversion to Islam, payment of jizya, or decapitation.  Some letters also threatened their recipients with  the bombings.  The letters further warned that the Swedish police will be unable to save Swedish Infidels (Any Swedish non-muslim) and that “death would extend to all.”

The letters warned their recipients that they had three days to decide.

The complete translation of the above letter follows:

 

In the name of allah, the vengeful, full of hate. You who are not believers will be decapitated in three days in your own house; we will bomb your rotten corpses afterwards.  You must choose between these three choices: 1. Convert to islam.  2. Pay the jizya [religious tax] for protection   3. Else, you will be decapitated. The Swedish police will not save you from you being murdered. (Death comes to all of you).

 

A Reckoning is Coming for the Foolish Infidels

The Death kneel of FRANCE

 

The Death of France begun five decades ago. In the 1960s, after the war in Algeria, President Charles de Gaulle directed the country toward closer relations with Arab and Muslim states.

Migratory flows of "guest workers(muslims)" from Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia, which had started a few years earlier, sharply increased. Immigrants were not encouraged to integrate. Everyone assumed they would return home at the end of their employment contracts. They were settled in the outskirts of big cities. The economy was dynamic, with strong job creation. All seemed well on the surface, but the French did not understand islam. The French could not comprehend the virulent spread of muslims like cancer across France at a rate not seen since the black death.  

Twenty years later the contagion of islam and it's corrosive effects became painfully obvious. The unchecked muslim immigrants now numbered in the millions. muslims from sub-Saharan Africa joined those coming from Arab nations.  Neighborhoods made up of just Arabs and Africans were stealthy  formed. The economy had slowed down and massive unemployment settled in. Because of French social spending the jobless muslims did not go back home, instead relying on social benefits. 

 

 Although many of these new arrivals had become French citizens, they were  resentful of France and the West. Political agitators started teaching them to attack and destroy Western civilization. Violent gangs of young Arabs and Africans began to intimidate the police. Clashes with police were common. Often, when a gang member was wounded, political agitators would help to incite more violence.

Because the French had no backbone the situation swiftly spun out of control.  

In 1984, a movement called SOS Racisme was created by Trotskyist militants, and began to define any criticism of immigration as "racist". Major leftist parties supported SOS Racism. They learned from the American Democrats that by accusing their political opponents of racism, they could attract the votes of blacks and muslims.  The presence of Islamist agitators, alongside agitators in Arab and African neighborhoods, plus the emergence of anti-Western Islamic discourse, alarmed many observers. SOS Racisme immediately declared that ANY  who spoke against muslims and blacks were both Islamophobic and racists.

 

In 1990, a law drafted by a Communist lawmaker, Jean-Claude Gayssot, was passed. It stipulated that "any discrimination based on ethnicity, nation, race or religion is prohibited." Since then, this law has been used to criminalize and SILENCE any criticism of Arab and African delinquency, any question on immigration from the Muslim world, any negative analysis of Islam. Many writers have been fined, and most "politically incorrect" books on those topics have disappeared from bookshops. This is FASCISM in it's rawest form.

The French government demanded the media to obey the "Gayssot law." It also had FRENCH history textbooks be rewritten to include chapters on the crimes committed by the West against Muslims, and on the "essential contribution" of Islam to humanity.  So, not only was FRENCH history being re-written, absolute lies about the contribution of islam to FRANCE was added as well.

 

In 2002, the situation in the country became dramatic.

Arab and African neighborhoods had NOW become "no-go zones." Radical Islam was widespread and Islamist attacks began. Dozens of cars would be torched each week. Muslim anti-Semitism was rising rapidly and led to an increase in anti-Jewish attacks. SOS Racisme and other anti-racist organizations were silent on Muslim anti-Semitism. Unwilling to be accused of "Islamophobic racism," organizations tasked with fighting against anti-Semitism were beaten into submission. islamic FEAR is the new political language in FRANCE.  Just like in every other country that islam has infiltrated VIOLENCE is the only thing islam has to contribute. 

A book, The Lost Territories of the Republic, by Georges Bensoussan (under the pen-name "Emmanuel Brenner"), was released. It depicted accurately what was going on. It spoke of the sweeping hatred for the West among young people of muslim origin, and of the full-blown hatred of Jews among young Muslims. It said that "no-go zones" were on the edge of secession and no longer a part of French territory. The mainstream media out of FEAR of muslim reprisals deliberately ignored the book.

Three years later, in October 2005, riots broke out across the country. More than 9,000 cars were torched by muslims. Hundreds of stores, supermarkets and shopping centers were looted and destroyed by muslims. Dozens of police officers were seriously injured by muslims. See a pattern developing?

 The violent uprising of muslims in FRANCE only stopped when the government begged for an agreement to make peace with Muslim associations. 

Today in 2017 FRANCE as a western nation has fallen.  All Democratic power in FRANCE has now been surrendered to the barbaric hoards of muslim invaders. islam, is a festering disease, which knows only one word...violence.    

 

France's one last hope is Marine Le Pen’s Front National.  She is running for a leadership role in Frances government. The globalists want her dead. She is the last French politician with the will to stand against the total islamic overthrow of France. She is also 100% for Frances exit from the European Union.  As you can imagine her life is in great danger...

obama should be indicted

 

 

Obama and his Department of Justice maliciously and criminally misused the FISA process to collect intelligence on Presidential candidate Donald J. Trump. Additionally, Obama personally relaxed the limitations on how such information collected could be disseminated in the weeks before leaving office.

 

The political ramifications from this, if proved correct, could be unprecedented in scope. Once fully exposed, it would explain the curious actions of Obama as he prepared to vacate the White House. It would also explain, in context, the actions and statements of not only Barack Hussein Obama, but others in key positions of power including Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, John Brennan, and others within the media.

Obama’s insistence to secure a federal wiretap warrant of Donald J. Trump, the candidate, using the federal court system as the mechanism to do so. The ostensible probable cause was alleged ties between Donald J. Trump and/or his associates with Russia.

The first warrant application was made in June 2016, according to reports published by The New York Times and elsewhere, but was rejected due to the lack of probable cause of criminal activity.

When the request was denied in regular federal court, Obama and his Justice Department attempted an “end around” by citing the existence of a “foreign actor” and made a similar surveillance warrant application through the more specialized Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court in October of 2016. According to published reports, that warrant application was rejected as well, a rare occurrence in the FISA venue, which strengthens claims that no evidence of any foreign involvement ever existed. It has been reported that the initial warrant application to the FISA court specifically named Donald J. Trump.

It is also relevant to note here that this is the type of activity that led to the creation of the infamous “Wall” that was referenced after the 9/11 attacks. Its relevance to this specific instance is explained well by former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy in this January 11, 2017 column.

Apparently undeterred, the Obama Justice Department submitted yet another application to the FISA court, this time omitting the name of Donald J. Trump and submitting it as a FISA specific case. The FISA court reportedly approved the application under the new and more narrow scope. Specifically, ties to two Russian banks: Russia’s SV bank and Alfa Bank. The alleged target was a computer server reportedly situated inside the Trump Tower.
Based on the lack of action consequential to that warrant and wiretap, it has been stated (and can be reasonably determined) that no actionable evidence was found.



Shortly before leaving office, Obama expanded the power of the National Security Agency (NSA) as detailed in the unclassified document titled Procedures for the Availability or Dissemination of Raw Signals Intelligence Information by the National Security Agency (NSA). As detailed in that document, limitations were changed on what the NSA could do with the information they collected through their surveillance operations. These changes effectively relaxed the restrictions on the dissemination of information collected on private citizens by broadening the access to such information.
It is also notable that on January 3, 2017, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed off on rule changes for phone taps.

 

It appears that President Trump has been provided the evidence of a paper trail leading to a FISA court that substantiates his assertions that Barack Hussein Obama, working in concert with others including those wielding the full might and power of various federal agencies, improperly obtained authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign under the pretense of a national security investigation, and continued such monitoring beyond its tenuous scope even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found.
This is as serious as it gets.



repost:http://canadafreepress.com/article/this-is-as-serious-as-it-gets?utm