We're From the Government We're here to Help

The NEW Maryland

 The Maryland Senate voted Thursday to remove references to the Confederacy from the official state song and replace the controversial portions of the historic anthem with a verse from a meaningless poem that has no merit or relationship to the TRUE past of Maryland. 

The 38-to-8 vote by spineless politicians came after a protracted debate about how Maryland should address its painful past.

Painful to Whom? 

 
Supporters of the bill said the song titled "Maryland, My Maryland," written by James Ryder Randall in 1861, is not unifying and does not represent the NEW Maryland.

A formless, isomorphic entity with no history, no scars, no struggles, no past.  It is NOW a Maryland devoid of a soul, history, families, folklore, ties to anything that might in any way offend anyone.  

Maryland's history, is being erased to ecstatic applause.  Just like the applause that rang out at the appointment of Adolf Hitler as German chancellor on January 30, 1933.  It was a NEW Germany just like now, it's a NEW Maryland.!

In the NEW America everyone is happy all the time because NO one is allowed to upset anyone on the special list. The special list is the protected class, the upper class, those that are MORE equal then others. 

The worst part of that is that it is only the beginning. Soon, all ties to America's past will be erased and replaced with fake, plastic, whitewashed images, portraying how happy the New America is thanks to those who were brave enough to erase it's past. 

 ISIS/ISIL in the middle east is doing the same thing. It is blowing up ancient monuments, historical buildings, burning artifacts all so ISIS/ISIL can remake the middle east in their image.

Randall wrote the song "Maryland, My Maryland" while he was upset over the death of a friend who was shot while protesting Union troops as they marched through Baltimore. It calls for Marylanders to take up arms and join the South in its battle against the Union!  For those with weak hearts look away because the song even calls Northerners "scum," and describes President Abraham Lincoln as a tyrant. 

OMG! such harsh words.  I'm going to need my University to immediately create a safe space, provide intense biweekly therapy and I'm going to need Federal government to pay all my bills since I'm not going to be able to work for the foreseeable future. Those words were too much for my fragile vegan, nonspecific gender, fluid sexuality mind to handle or process.

Randall's feelings, those feelings of the other Southerners who lost family members, businesses, monies, estates, titles, jobs, etc. are of no consequence to the NEW Maryland.   The NEW Maryland has nothing to do with the OLD, WHITE, CHRISTIAN, SOUTHERN, Maryland, no not at all. The NEW Maryland is kid friendly, anti-white, pro-homosexual, pro-Islam, pro atheists, with a Planned Parenthood on every corner and a 24hr Pharmacy that carries Plan-B abortifacient on every shelf.  

The bill passed by the Senate on Thursday calls for some of Randall's lyrics to be replaced with a verse from a poem written by John T. White in 1894. The bill now moves to the House for consideration.
"I think it's time to get rid of the verse that basically criticizes and makes us look bad," said Sen. Ronald N. Young , D-Frederick. "The [song] is degrading to Maryland and should not represent us moving forward."

Opponents of the bill had their FACEBOOK accounts deleted and were summarily branded White privileged,  Homophobic, Religious Fanatics, who are Hateful Bigots and most likely Cis-gendered inbreds Conservative Republicans...

US high schools to Snitch on students who show signs of being Individuals

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has introduced a new mass surveillance program which instructs US high schools to report students who show signs of being future terrorists.

https://info.publicintelligence.net/FBI-PreventingExtremismSchools.pdf

The FBI’s program, labeled ‘Preventing Violent Extremism in Schools’, was released in January, providing guidelines mostly laid out to target Muslim-American communities and educational centers.

"High school students are ideal targets for recruitment by violent extremists seeking support for their radical ideologies, foreign fighter networks, or conducting acts of violence within our borders," the FBI program guidelines read....Have these people ever been to a US high school?  Most kids in High school are struggling to pass math class, let alone plotting the overthrown of the Western Democracies!  

 

It's also a perfect time to instill fear and suspicion in young individuals.   By blanketing teens with fear individuality is stifled. 

The FBI calls on teachers to “incorporate a two-hour block of violent extremism awareness training” into the core curriculum for all youth in grades 9 through 12.

This is more about intimidation and fear programming then actually finding any future terrorists.  By convincing young people that a boogeyman is hiding behind every corner they will be more susceptible to government propaganda and accepting of mass government surveillance. 
 
The guidelines instruct educators to look for warning signs or indicators that a student could exhibit as a potential threat regarding extremism, such as talking about traveling to places that sound suspicious, using code words or unusual language, using several different cell phones and private messaging apps, and studying or taking pictures of potential targets like a government building.

Yeah, because everyone knows that terrorists with box cutters are hiding in the local high school band camp.  They may look like confused teenagers with acne trying master the trombone, but in reality they are brilliant terrorists operatives a heartbeat away from toppling the European Union.  

US high school staff maintain that many of these so-called indicators are too broad to be effective.

So, we need to narrow the criteria down to ANYONE who dares question the government in any way. ANYONE who is an individual.  ANYONE who 'Thinks too much. ANYONE who references the Founding Father, the Constitution, and heaven forbid dare utter the phrase...Second Amendment.' 


The program seems to be in line with a similar one operated in the UK, known as 'Preventing Violent Extremism', which relies on mass-surveillance of  the country’s public schools.

The first name they chose was 'Keeping the Slaves in Line' but that one was already taken.

The program in the UK was heavily bashed by rights groups and activists.

Yet, because everyone in the UK is actual property of the Queen there was nothing they could do except complain while maintaining a stiff upper lip (All very British I'm told) .  

 

"Case studies show that children are being taken away from mandatory school hours to be questioned on matters misconstrued as markers of extremism. To say that this is an injustice to the youth, to America as a whole is an understatement.  

The real truth here is the children are being indoctrinated in the current political Re-education system. They are being groomed for the New World Order as worker slaves who have been taught from a young age that they have NO freedoms, No privacy, and No free-thought without a permit. 

The Way of the World

Judge Andrew P. Napolitano thoughts on the Hillary Email woes

 

 

Judge Andrew P. Napolitano 

"While her husband has been arguing with military veterans at her political rallies and while Marco Rubio and Donald Trump have been mocking each other’s body parts, a series of curious developments has occurred in the Clinton email scandal.

It is fair to call this a scandal because it consists of the public revelation of the private and probably criminal misdeeds of the nation’s chief diplomat during President Obama’s first term in office. Mrs. Clinton’s job as secretary of state was to keep secrets. Instead, she exposed them to friend and foe. The exposure of state secrets, either intentionally or negligently, constitutes the crime of espionage. For the secretary of state to have committed espionage is, quite simply, scandalous.


We are not addressing just a handful of emails. To date, the State Department has revealed the presence of more than 2,000 emails on her private server that contained state secrets — and four that were select access privilege, or SAP. The SAP emails require special codes in order to access them. The codes change continually, and very few people in the government have the codes. SAP is a subcategory of “top secret,” and it constitutes the highest level of protected secrecy, for the utmost protection of the government’s gravest secrets. It is unheard of for SAP-level data to reside in a non-secure, vulnerable venue — yet that is where Mrs. Clinton caused four SAPs to reside.

 

Mrs. Clinton’s allies in the State Department have perpetrated the myth that the 2,000 emails were recently upgraded to reflect their secret contents. That is untrue. The emails possess secret status by virtue of their contents, not because of any markings on them. Mrs. Clinton had a legal obligation to recognize state secrets when she saw them, no matter their markings or non-markings. On her first day on the job, she swore under oath that she recognized and understood that legal obligation and she promised to comply with it. She did not comply.


This past weekend, the newly revealed emails showed that Mrs. Clinton emailed about the location of drone strikes. By their very nature, such emails contain state secrets. They contained state secrets when she received them; they contained them when she sent them; and they contain state secrets today.
Also this past weekend, Gen. Michael Hayden, formerly director of the CIA and of the National Security Agency, stated on CNN that it is a near certainty that the Russian government and others had access to Mrs. Clinton’s non-secure server and all it contained.


Lawyers familiar with the terminology of state secrets will refrain from using the word “classified” to describe the emails that contained state secrets, even though Mrs. Clinton repeatedly does that. The word “classified” is not a legal term; rather, it is derived from the verb “to classify,” and it means that the classification process has been completed.  Since nothing is marked “classified” — the legal markings are “confidential,” “secret” and “top secret”

 

 Mrs. Clinton has been materially misleading the public and the FBI when she claims that she never sent or received anything “marked classified.”
By saying that, she wants us to believe that in more than 2,000 instances, she failed to ascertain the presence of state secrets in emails she received or sent. No voter but the most hardened supporter, no federal prosecutor, no FBI agent and no juror will believe that.


The FBI investigation process is coming to its logical conclusion, and the judge who ordered the State Department to release all of Mrs. Clinton’s emails also has ordered that her top State Department aides submit to oral depositions — examinations under oath before trial — in the Freedom of Information Act litigation brought by Judicial Watch against the State Department.


He directed the Judicial Watch lawyers to ascertain whether there was a conspiracy in the secretary of state’s office to violate federal law. If those lawyers find evidence of such a conspiracy, they may then seek the oral examination of Mrs. Clinton herself.
This search for a conspiracy will take Mrs. Clinton down the road to perdition — to the end of her hopes. Along that road are instructions to a subordinate to divert all her government emails through her private server. On the side of that road are emails instructing her aides to remove “secret” markings from documents and resend the documents to her via a non-secure fax machine.

 

On that road are emails revealing the names of secret undercover intelligence assets, the locations of North Korean nuclear facilities, the transcripts of telephone conversations among foreign intelligence agents, and the travel plans of then-U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens in the days before he was murdered.


 Democrats who indulge in Mrs. Clinton’s false hopes will do so at their peril. Don’t they want to know of her potential status as a criminal defendant before they complete their nominating process? Or do they, like her, think that they can just hope that all this will go away?

 

 excerpted from:http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/2/andrew-napolitano-hillary-clintons-false-hopes/