Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Thursday, April 24, 2014
The Great American Decline
U.S. public policy is ENTIRELY dominated by LOBBYIST, Corporations, BANKS, and UNIONS.
Any issues which deal with Civil Liberties, popular rights have almost ZERO chance of swaying political opinion. In Washington ALL policy making is controlled by those with the deepest pockets and largest coffers.
Professors at Princeton and Northwestern have sifted through two decades’ worth of data to offer perhaps the most detailed analysis to date of the United States’ modern claim to being a democracy. The results, they say, are stark.
“Americans do enjoy many features central to democratic governance, such as regular elections, freedom of speech and association and a widespread (if still contested) franchise,” according to the research paper by Princeton University Professor Martin Gilens and Northwestern University Professor Benjamin I. Page.
“But we believe that if policymaking is dominated by powerful business organizations and a small number of affluent Americans, then America’s claims to being a democratic society is nothing more then window dressing..."
Anyone who still believes that the United States is a FREE society is lost in the propaganda of the past. The American dream dies in 1913 when the country became enslaved by foreign banking interests. After all Woodrow Wilson, like every politician after him sold this country into slavery simply because he wanted power. W. Wilson wanted to be president and that was all that concerned him. Not he millions who would die in 2 consecutive world wars, not the many generations of Americans who would have to bear the weight of an illegal and unpayable debt conjured out of thin air by foreign banking interests. The Founders of this once FREE country wrote into the US Constitution that ONLY Congress can print and control the US monetary supply. In 1913 what America got was what it has had ever since, a plague on all mankind, politicians. Men and women whose sole interests in life is their own greed and avarice.
53% of Americans polled said that neither party represents them...
The research paper paper is slated for publication in an upcoming issue of Perspectives on Politics, a peer-reviewed journal. In it, Gilens and Page reviewed nearly 2,000 national surveys conducted between 1981 and 2002 that touched on hundreds of public policy changes concerning “matters of relatively high salience, about which it is plausible that average citizens may have real opinions and may exert some political influence.” The researchers correlated the responses in terms of respondents’ income, then figured out how often different groups’ preferred policies were implemented.
They found, first, that the rich and poor see many policy proposals from roughly the same perspective.
However, the data is more interesting when their views diverge. Gilens and Page report that policies lacking broad support among the rich are only implemented around 18 percent of the time. On the other hand, proposals supported by the elite are adopted more than twice as often, some 45 percent of the time.
“Not only do ordinary citizens not have uniquely substantial power over policy decisions; they have little or no independent influence on policy at all.”
“By contrast, economic elites (The Rich) are estimated to have a quite substantial, highly significant, independent impact on policy … In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule!" As a matter of record the majority have no say what so ever when it comes to policy making in Washington D.C.
Make no mistake, those in both houses of Congress, the legislative branch, and the executive branch have little or no understanding of the lives common American.
To those in Washington D.C. Americans are nothing more then sheep to be fleeced...
Any issues which deal with Civil Liberties, popular rights have almost ZERO chance of swaying political opinion. In Washington ALL policy making is controlled by those with the deepest pockets and largest coffers.
Professors at Princeton and Northwestern have sifted through two decades’ worth of data to offer perhaps the most detailed analysis to date of the United States’ modern claim to being a democracy. The results, they say, are stark.
“Americans do enjoy many features central to democratic governance, such as regular elections, freedom of speech and association and a widespread (if still contested) franchise,” according to the research paper by Princeton University Professor Martin Gilens and Northwestern University Professor Benjamin I. Page.
“But we believe that if policymaking is dominated by powerful business organizations and a small number of affluent Americans, then America’s claims to being a democratic society is nothing more then window dressing..."
Anyone who still believes that the United States is a FREE society is lost in the propaganda of the past. The American dream dies in 1913 when the country became enslaved by foreign banking interests. After all Woodrow Wilson, like every politician after him sold this country into slavery simply because he wanted power. W. Wilson wanted to be president and that was all that concerned him. Not he millions who would die in 2 consecutive world wars, not the many generations of Americans who would have to bear the weight of an illegal and unpayable debt conjured out of thin air by foreign banking interests. The Founders of this once FREE country wrote into the US Constitution that ONLY Congress can print and control the US monetary supply. In 1913 what America got was what it has had ever since, a plague on all mankind, politicians. Men and women whose sole interests in life is their own greed and avarice.
53% of Americans polled said that neither party represents them...
The research paper paper is slated for publication in an upcoming issue of Perspectives on Politics, a peer-reviewed journal. In it, Gilens and Page reviewed nearly 2,000 national surveys conducted between 1981 and 2002 that touched on hundreds of public policy changes concerning “matters of relatively high salience, about which it is plausible that average citizens may have real opinions and may exert some political influence.” The researchers correlated the responses in terms of respondents’ income, then figured out how often different groups’ preferred policies were implemented.
They found, first, that the rich and poor see many policy proposals from roughly the same perspective.
However, the data is more interesting when their views diverge. Gilens and Page report that policies lacking broad support among the rich are only implemented around 18 percent of the time. On the other hand, proposals supported by the elite are adopted more than twice as often, some 45 percent of the time.
“Not only do ordinary citizens not have uniquely substantial power over policy decisions; they have little or no independent influence on policy at all.”
“By contrast, economic elites (The Rich) are estimated to have a quite substantial, highly significant, independent impact on policy … In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule!" As a matter of record the majority have no say what so ever when it comes to policy making in Washington D.C.
Make no mistake, those in both houses of Congress, the legislative branch, and the executive branch have little or no understanding of the lives common American.
To those in Washington D.C. Americans are nothing more then sheep to be fleeced...
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Ms Park Ji Young, a crew member of the ferry Sewol is a Korean HERO
Ms Park Ji Young, a 22-year-old crew member of the ferry Sewol, was among them. She lost her life while struggling to ensure that all passengers on the third and fourth floors of the vessel wore life jackets and found their way out.
"I repeatedly asked her why she did not first wear a life jacket. Park just said that she would get out of the ship after making sure that all passengers were out. She said the crew including her would be the last (to escape)," a survivor told the media.
"Park pushed shocked passengers toward the exit even when the water was up to her chest."
Mr Kim Jong Hwang, a 58-year-old survivor, also remembered Ms Park's evacuation efforts.
"When the ship turned upside down, passengers were put on a door with one of them falling through it. Park dragged the passenger out of it and pushed others out of their quarters," he said.
Ms Park joined the ferry company in 2012 to earn money to support her poor family although she was admitted to a college in South Chungcheong province that year. When her body arrived at a hospital, her mother broke down.
Many other Korean Hero's were there on that fateful day. Mr Jeong Cha Woong, a 17-year-old student, is also being hailed as a hero. He died after helping his friends escape from the ship. Mr Jeong is known to have died after giving his own life vest to his drowning friend and hurled himself into the waters to rescue others.
Mr Kim Hong Gyeong, a 59-year-old survivor, also risked his life to save other people.
Mr Kim made a 10m-long rope with curtains of the ship and used it to drag up several passengers. Although the water was above his knees, he continued his rescue efforts and saved the lives of some 20 people. He, then, boarded a fishing boat that volunteered in the rescue operations
To Our brothers and sisters in South Korea our hearts and prayers here in America go out to you.
Friday, April 18, 2014
Bureau of Land Management in Violation of U.S. Constitution
Above image: American Patriots who prayed before placing their lives on the line to defend FREEDOM at Bundy Ranch
Words of a TRUE American Statesmen come at a time when the nation teeters on Fascism... Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman sent a letter to Barack Obama, Department of the Interior Sec. Sally Jewell, and BLM Director Neil Kornze, laying out his position that any such action by the agency would violate the U.S. Constitution.
“Because of this standoff,” he wrote, “I have looked into BLM’s authority to conduct such paramilitary raids against American citizens, and it appears that BLM is acting in a lawless manner in Nevada.”
He cited the limited powers granted to the federal government, noting the bureau has no “right to assume preemptory police powers, that role being reserved to the States,” and explained “many federal laws require the federal government to seek assistance from local law enforcement whenever the use of force may become necessary.”
The letter included a section of the U.S. Code — 43 U.S.C. Section 1733, Subsection C — stating exactly that point.
“When the Secretary determines that assistance is necessary in enforcing Federal laws and regulations relating to the public lands or their resources he shall offer a contract to appropriate local officials having law enforcement authority within their respective jurisdictions with the view of achieving maximum feasible reliance upon local law enforcement officials in enforcing such laws and regulations.”
The letter included a section of the U.S. Code — 43 U.S.C. Section 1733, Subsection C —
In the case of the Bundy Ranch, he continued, “the relevant local law enforcement officials appear to be the Sheriff of Clark County, Nevada, Douglas C. Gillespie.”
Gillespie, however, was given a back seat to BLM forces during the standoff.
“Indeed,” Stockman wrote, “the exact type of crisis that the federal government has provoked at the Bundy ranch is the very type of incident that Congress knew could be avoided by relying on local law enforcement officials.”
The stated purpose of the correspondence is for the Obama administration “to bring the BLM into compliance with 43 U.S.C. section 1733.”
Absent a full investigation into the agency’s actions, he concluded, “the federal government must not only stand down, but remove all federal personnel from anywhere near the Bundy ranch.”
After
the federal Bureau of Land Management agents backed down from their
intimidating stance at the Bundy Ranch last weekend, ample evidence has
surfaced indicating the standoff between the government and the Nevada
ranching family is far from over. Throughout the weeklong stalemate,
members of the Bundy family were physically assaulted by armed officers,
numerous cows were shot dead, and protesters faced threats of gunfire
for merely expressing their outrage.
Immediately after what many considered a victory against a tyrannical federal agency, a number of leftist voices – most notably, Sen. Harry Reid – indicated the action against this family will continue.
In response, Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman sent a letter to
Barack Obama, Department of the Interior Sec. Sally Jewell, and BLM
Director Neil Kornze, laying out his position that any such action by
the agency would violate the U.S. Constitution.
“Because of this standoff,” he wrote, “I have looked into BLM’s authority to conduct such paramilitary raids against American citizens, and it appears that BLM is acting in a lawless manner in Nevada.”
He cited the limited powers granted to the federal government, noting the bureau has no “right to assume preemptory police powers, that role being reserved to the States,” and explained “many federal laws require the federal government to seek assistance from local law enforcement whenever the use of force may become necessary.”
The letter included a section of the U.S. Code — 43 U.S.C. Section 1733, Subsection C
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/congressman-pens-letter-obama-blasting-lawless-blm/#3EUoscB5bbeRjLAC.99
Immediately after what many considered a victory against a tyrannical federal agency, a number of leftist voices – most notably, Sen. Harry Reid – indicated the action against this family will continue.
“Because of this standoff,” he wrote, “I have looked into BLM’s authority to conduct such paramilitary raids against American citizens, and it appears that BLM is acting in a lawless manner in Nevada.”
He cited the limited powers granted to the federal government, noting the bureau has no “right to assume preemptory police powers, that role being reserved to the States,” and explained “many federal laws require the federal government to seek assistance from local law enforcement whenever the use of force may become necessary.”
The letter included a section of the U.S. Code — 43 U.S.C. Section 1733, Subsection C
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/congressman-pens-letter-obama-blasting-lawless-blm/#3EUoscB5bbeRjLAC.99
After
the federal Bureau of Land Management agents backed down from their
intimidating stance at the Bundy Ranch last weekend, ample evidence has
surfaced indicating the standoff between the government and the Nevada
ranching family is far from over. Throughout the weeklong stalemate,
members of the Bundy family were physically assaulted by armed officers,
numerous cows were shot dead, and protesters faced threats of gunfire
for merely expressing their outrage.
Immediately after what many considered a victory against a tyrannical federal agency, a number of leftist voices – most notably, Sen. Harry Reid – indicated the action against this family will continue.
In response, Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman sent a letter to
Barack Obama, Department of the Interior Sec. Sally Jewell, and BLM
Director Neil Kornze, laying out his position that any such action by
the agency would violate the U.S. Constitution.
“Because of this standoff,” he wrote, “I have looked into BLM’s authority to conduct such paramilitary raids against American citizens, and it appears that BLM is acting in a lawless manner in Nevada.”
He cited the limited powers granted to the federal government, noting the bureau has no “right to assume preemptory police powers, that role being reserved to the States,” and explained “many federal laws require the federal government to seek assistance from local law enforcement whenever the use of force may become necessary.”
The letter included a section of the U.S. Code — 43 U.S.C. Section 1733, Subsection C
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/congressman-pens-letter-obama-blasting-lawless-blm/#3EUoscB5bbeRjLAC.99
Immediately after what many considered a victory against a tyrannical federal agency, a number of leftist voices – most notably, Sen. Harry Reid – indicated the action against this family will continue.
“Because of this standoff,” he wrote, “I have looked into BLM’s authority to conduct such paramilitary raids against American citizens, and it appears that BLM is acting in a lawless manner in Nevada.”
He cited the limited powers granted to the federal government, noting the bureau has no “right to assume preemptory police powers, that role being reserved to the States,” and explained “many federal laws require the federal government to seek assistance from local law enforcement whenever the use of force may become necessary.”
The letter included a section of the U.S. Code — 43 U.S.C. Section 1733, Subsection C
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/congressman-pens-letter-obama-blasting-lawless-blm/#3EUoscB5bbeRjLAC.99
Sunday, April 13, 2014
GOD Bless the American PATRIOT
PATRIOTS, one and all, risked their lives to defend AMERICAN FREEDOM, advanced on a position held by BLM agents despite threats that they would be shot one and all. It was these brave, feraless Americans who eventually forced the lackeys of Bureau of Land Management (BLM) feds to release 100 cattle that had been stolen from Bundy as part of a land grab dispute that threatened to escalate into a Waco-style confrontation.
In a tense standoff, armed BLM feds, backed up by at
least two SWAT team, threatened to shoot Bundy supporters if they
marched any closer to a line of vehicles.
Despite death threats from Bullhorns such as “one more step and you’re dead, we will kill you all” GOD fearing, Constitution supporting AMERICANS marched into the face of certain death. Despite knowing that the FEDS have killed innocent Americans without conscious, these died in the wool FREE men and women did not back down but marched forward straight into the barrels of the BLM agents.
Refusing to back down, the protesters marched straight past the armed men and towards the cattle pen.
Sheriff Gillespie eventually appeared to inform Bundy
supporters that the BLM had finally caved and agreed to release the 100
cattle they had seized that were inside the pen.
After around 30 minutes, Bundy supporters saw the cattle being released about a mile away in the distance.
Make no mistake...The ONLY TWO reasons the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) agents backed down was because these FREE men and women were armed, heavily armed, and it was this deterrent, this ACE in the hole of the American People that the BLM backed down. The agents of the BLM knew that if they opened fire on innocent Americans that their lives would be forfeit. This is WHY the 2nd Amendment is absolutely necessary to the life blood of any FREE Republic.
The 2nd reason that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) agents backed down was the fact that there were PATRIOTS on the side of the BLM. There were those FREE men who worked for the BLM and understood that this is OUR America, OUR Land of the Free. These men worked WITH the PATRIOTS at Clive Bundy's Ranch to see that a non-violent outcome would be worked out. This will always be the thorn in the side of Tyrants the world over. that is, Free men and women hidden in their own ranks. As we saw this weekend on a dusty desert plain...it is only when Free men stand together to throw off the chains of tyranny, that the colors of Liberty and Justice may light the way to victory. Remember what George Washington said about Free men Versus paid mercenaries...
"Freemen, contending for liberty on their own ground, are far superior to any slavish mercenary sent by far away masters, the earth over..."
I salute every PATRIOT, every FREE man, woman, and child who went to the aid of a fellow American who was in danger of being robbed and murdered by an out of control Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
Sunday, April 06, 2014
obama Lied...Again
Liar and chief obama declared Tuesday his signature piece of crap called obamacare a success, saying it has made America's health care system 'a lot better' in a Rose Garden press conference. He lied straight face to the cameras by saying 7 million, paying Americans have signed up for obamacare.
The truth, something obama and the rest of the Democrats are woefully out of touch with, is that only 858,000 Americans have signed up for obama care and are actually paying fees.
The RAND Corporation, who's report the white house is desperately trying to keep hidden, has stated that less then 858,000 previously uninsured Americans have signed up and are actually paying fees. The rest of the inflated figure of 7.1 million are people who are ALREADY receiving Medicare and these people are paying NOTHING. These Medicare people will NEVER pay fees into the system. The remaining numbers of the vastly over stated 7 million are actually prisoners who were previously being covered by State Medicare systems. The States have figured out that they can now shift their State prison costs to the federal government through the new obamacare debacle.
Obama REFUSED to take any questions which would force him to respond with cold hard facts. The worst part is there are so many holes in the 7 million number for obamacare that even softball questions from liberal left wing reporters were to dangerous to his flimsy 7 million obamacare fairy tale. Then, after avoiding reality all together obama took pot shots at Republicans who PRETENDED to have opposed the law from the beginning.
I am not the only one speaking out on this...This is from Judicial Watch:
In other Obamacare related news this week, the president crowed about the number of people who have allegedly signed up for Obamacare – 7.1 million according to the president’s number crunchers. But it’s hard to find anyone buying what the president is selling. Remember the term fuzzy math?
We had to sue, again, to get basic information about Obamacare’s early enrollment numbers (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:13-cv-01855)). We are still waiting for answers. So without supporting documentation and given his history of lies and stonewalling, I don’t believe much of anything President Obama has to say about Obamacare.
This distrust is widely shared. The 7.1 million number is “under a cloud of suspicion,” reported Breitbart.com, noting there were large gaps in what we know about the figures. “Phony number,” said Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer. “These guys go six months without any idea what the numbers are, and all of a sudden it’s to a decimal point,” he said. And the London Daily Mail summed up the reason for all of this distrust:
“…buried in the 7.1 million enrollments he announced in a heavily staged appearance is a more unsettling reality. Numbers from a RAND Corporation study that has been kept under wraps suggest that barely 858,000 previously uninsured Americans – nowhere near 7.1 million – have paid for new policies and joined the ranks of the insured by Monday night.
And then there are the folks who paid their premiums but did not get coverage! The CBS affiliate in Las Vegas reported that as the president was doing his victory lap, residents of Las Vegas were filing the first class action lawsuit against the State of Nevada, the Nevada state-run health exchange and the company that built it, Xerox:
Just days after the deadline to enroll
for insurance coverage through Nevada Health Link, the first
class-action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of residents who say they
signed up and paid their premiums – but were never given coverage.
Law firm Callister & Associates filed
the lawsuit on behalf of Larry Basich, who signed up for state health
insurance and paid premiums as far back as November, but then was not
covered following a Jan. 3 triple bypass procedure that saw his $400,000
in medical expenses passed between the wrong insurance companies, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reports.
It is obvious that obamacare is nothing more then a government-run seizure of one-seventh of the U.S. economy.
NAME one thing the Government made better by becoming involved?
The truth is the Republicans could really care less about obamacare. If they actually cared at all, this dung pile called obamacare would NEVER have been made into a law. There is no difference between the Republicans and the Democrats. Neither party cares one wit about the American people. The 2 party dictatorship here in America is simply 2 heads of the same snake.
Both parties have gleefully sold this once great country into finical slavery. What neither party is taking into account is that at some point the bill for all this FREE MONEY will come due. There will be a reckoning, the only question is will it be from the tip of an ICBM or will it be food riots which leave America's cities burning long into the night.
My question is what will it take for Americans to wake up an realize that Washington has sold out the rest of the country. The politicians in Washington see the Average American as nothing more then sheep to be led to the slaughter. Either, this country wakes up or we are looking at 1939 Germany all over again. Only, this time, there is no great bastion of Democracy and Freedom to save the day.
Thursday, April 03, 2014
I Support the RIGHT of Free Speech of Brendan Eich
Brendan Eich, CEO and co-founder of Mozilla — and the inventor of Javascript programming language — has come under fire from the HOMOSEXUAL Lobby and Far Left extremists for a legal $1,000 donation he made in support of California’s Proposition 8, a 2008 ballot proposition defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. While Eich’s donation made headlines and then fizzled back in 2012, his recent CEO appointment brought it back to the forefront.
Brendan Eich who did NOTHING wrong but express, in action, his own beliefs. Now, because of crushing NAZI attacks by MINORITY homosexual hate groups and those companies which panders to them, Brendan is being forced to hide his rightfully held convictions and retract his previous actions. The last I checked this is AMERICA and this is a country where everyone has the right to believe what they want. When did America become a FASCIST state where only the beliefs of sexual perverse people have the right to be spoken or held?
The malicious, hate filled, homosexual lobby dared to say... Those who seek to deny love and instead enforce misery, shame, and frustration are our enemies, and we wish them nothing but failure.”
Why is it anyone who differs in their beliefs from the rabidly depraved homosexual lobby is painted as hateful and non-inclusive? In truth, if anyone with common sense where to shine a light on the pernicious verbal attacks by the liberal left it would be clear to see that the hateful and non-inclusive people are the homosexual lobby.
When did the Homosexual lobby corner the market on love and inclusion? Homosexuals are not the only human beings who have ever struggled, loved, or been persecuted. Let me let the late to the party, homosexual hate groups in on a little secret. We ALL have been discriminated against, we ALL have been excluded at some point in time, we ALL have experienced what it is like to not be wanted by one group or another. We ALL have been the but of jokes, been the receiving end of sharp hurtful comments. We ALL have had someone we know commit suicide because of one reason or another. We ALL have been bullied because of things we were born with, from hair color, to bad teeth, to wearing glassess, etc.
Just because homosexuals have had their feelings hurt doesn't give them the right to silence EVERYONE else on the planet. Homosexuals are less then 1 percent of the population, those are real world numbers. The homosexual hate lobby would have you believe that the number is 10 percent, bu that number is way WAY off. Last I checked 1 percent of the population doesn't have the right to tell the rest of the other 90 percent how they can live and speak! In fact, NO percent of the population has the right to tell ANYONE how to live and speak. This is a free country and dam it, I am gonna live it, speak it, and walk it, because I refuse to be bowed down and trodden upon by ANYONE. Especially some hate filled, vitriol spewing, far left hate group known as the homosexual hate lobby.
Because
the homosexual rights groups have been unable to persuade the majority
of Americans that homosexuality is good for us, they have resorted to
attacking anyone who speaks the majority opinion. In so doing the gay
thought police have revealed themselves for what they really
are--bullies who threaten and intimidate those who dare to speak out
against them.
We must ask who the real bigots are here. In America, speaking one's mind is a Constitutionally-protected right. The real bigots are those who label anyone who disagrees with them as bigoted and intolerant and attack them for sharing their beliefs. Mr. Santorum has not called for anyone's resignation or dismissal. His detractors have. Once again, the homosexual-rights groups have revealed that they are the real bigots.
Read more at http://www.beliefnet.com/News/2003/05/A-Deviance-From-Gods-Norm.aspx#CSClJvmojdlPPj46.99
We must ask who the real bigots are here. In America, speaking one's mind is a Constitutionally-protected right. The real bigots are those who label anyone who disagrees with them as bigoted and intolerant and attack them for sharing their beliefs. Mr. Santorum has not called for anyone's resignation or dismissal. His detractors have. Once again, the homosexual-rights groups have revealed that they are the real bigots.
Read more at http://www.beliefnet.com/News/2003/05/A-Deviance-From-Gods-Norm.aspx#CSClJvmojdlPPj46.99
Because
the homosexual rights groups have been unable to persuade the majority
of Americans that homosexuality is good for us, they have resorted to
attacking anyone who speaks the majority opinion. In so doing the gay
thought police have revealed themselves for what they really
are--bullies who threaten and intimidate those who dare to speak out
against them.
We must ask who the real bigots are here. In America, speaking one's mind is a Constitutionally-protected right. The real bigots are those who label anyone who disagrees with them as bigoted and intolerant and attack them for sharing their beliefs. Mr. Santorum has not called for anyone's resignation or dismissal. His detractors have. Once again, the homosexual-rights groups have revealed that they are the real bigots.
Read more at http://www.beliefnet.com/News/2003/05/A-Deviance-From-Gods-Norm.aspx#CSClJvmojdlPPj46.99v
The real truth of the matter is that the homosexual lobby have been unable to persuade the majority of Americans that homosexuality is anything other then it is, an aberration. The far left NAZI's have resorted to attacking anyone who speaks the the truth, that being the majority opinion in America. In so doing the homosexual thought police have revealed themselves for what they really are--bigots, thugs, and bullies who threaten and intimidate those ANYONE who dare to speak out against them. Not only speak out against them, but to actually think differently then them. Now, the homosexual hate lobby has made it a public sin to even disagree with them. Now, in America you are not even allowed to publicly have any other opinion then that which the far left NAZI's will approve. We must ask who the real bigots are here. In America, speaking one's mind is a Constitutionally-protected right. The real bigots are those who label anyone who disagrees with them as bigoted and intolerant and attack them for sharing their beliefs. Mr. Santorum has not called for anyone's resignation or dismissal. His detractors have. Once again, the homosexual-rights groups have revealed that they are the real bigots.
Read more at http://www.beliefnet.com/News/2003/05/A-Deviance-From-Gods-Norm.aspx#CSClJvmojdlPPj46.99v
We must ask who are the REAL HATE groups in America? The last I checked this was American soil, speaking one's mind is a Constitutionally-protected right. The real modern day NAZI's are those who label anyone who disagrees with them as non-inclusive, intolerant, and hateful. The homosexual hate lobby attack any and all Americans who dare to stand fast and SPEAK their own convictions. For anyone with the courage to look and the strength to speak the truth...it is the homosexual hate lobby who has revealed that they are the hateful, non-inclusive, bigots in modern day America!
Wednesday, April 02, 2014
Vladimir Putin is Net Worth: $75 Billion
- Source of Wealth Oil & Gas, Investments
- Birth Place Leningrad, Soviet Union (St. Petersburg, Russia)
- Height 5' 7" (1.70 m)
- Marital Status Married (Lyudmila Aleksandrovna)
- Full Name Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin
- Nationality Russia
- Date of Birth 7 October 1952
- Ethnicity Russian
- Weight Unknown
- Occupation Politician, Businessman
- Education PhD (Leningrad State University)
- Children 2 (Mariya, Yekaterina)
Current President of Russia Vladimir Putin has an estimated net worth
of $75 billion in 2013. He has been serving the post since May 7, 2012.
Since 2008, he has been serving as the Chairman of political party,
United Russia.
From 1999 through 2000, Putin served as Russia’s Prime Minister. A year later, he became the country’s president, a position he held until 2008. During the 2008 presidential election, Dmitry Medvedev won as President. He appointed Putin as Prime Minister, a position he held from 2008 through 2012. Putin again became President in May of 2012.
obama's, tax return last year showed that he and michelle grossed a meager $608,611 for the calendar year 2012 (his 2013 tax forms should be released soon). Most of that income came from Barack's book royalties and $400,000 Presidential salary.
President, Vladimir Putin, last April, revealed both his salary and estimated net worth. Putin, being s shrewd player on the world stage, used his last decade of absolute power to stash away a vast personal fortune estimated at more than $70 billion. A very respectable accomplishment for a man brave enough to take on the global elite. A man who has seemingly won in every sense of the word. It seems that a quote from C. Sheen applies here....
From 1999 through 2000, Putin served as Russia’s Prime Minister. A year later, he became the country’s president, a position he held until 2008. During the 2008 presidential election, Dmitry Medvedev won as President. He appointed Putin as Prime Minister, a position he held from 2008 through 2012. Putin again became President in May of 2012.
obama's, tax return last year showed that he and michelle grossed a meager $608,611 for the calendar year 2012 (his 2013 tax forms should be released soon). Most of that income came from Barack's book royalties and $400,000 Presidential salary.
President, Vladimir Putin, last April, revealed both his salary and estimated net worth. Putin, being s shrewd player on the world stage, used his last decade of absolute power to stash away a vast personal fortune estimated at more than $70 billion. A very respectable accomplishment for a man brave enough to take on the global elite. A man who has seemingly won in every sense of the word. It seems that a quote from C. Sheen applies here....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)