Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Tuesday, April 18, 2017
A Day in the life of islam in America
Three people are dead in a shooting spree in
downtown Fresno, California today. The suspect was wanted in connection to the
fatal shooting of security guard Carl Williams at the Motel 6 in Fresno.
Muhammad allegedly also tried to shoot a second security guard but was
out of bullets, police say.
Kori Ali Muhammad, 39, shouted "Allahu Akbar" as police tackled him to the ground, Police Chief Jerry Dyer said.
The victims appeared to be not random, Dyer said.
Shot
Spotter detected the first gunshots around 10:45 a.m. Muhammad shot
into a PG&E vehicle killing the passenger. The driver sped away and
drove to Fresno Police headquarters.
Muhammad
continued walking and opened fire at a local resident but missed.
Shortly after, he encountered another resident and shot and killed that
person.
He then continued to the area of Catholic Charities where he shot and killed a person in the parking lot.
Chief Dyer said Muhammad's Facebook account
indicated that he "does not like white people", he also expressed anti-government sentiments. All victims of Tuesday's
shooting were white, as well as the 4th person he shot at.
The Fall of Democracy in Turkey

Turkey’s move to abandon parliamentary democracy and adopt one-man rule fulfills a long-held dream of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan,
who not only expands his powers, but also gets a chance to stay in
office for another 15 years if the current referendum
ballot count holds up.
The official Anadolu news agency said the
country voted on Sunday 24.3 million to 23.2 million, a margin of 51.1
to 48.8 percent, in favor of a package of constitutional reforms. But
the opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) said it will challenge
well over 1 million ballots which lacked the seal of the election
oversight board.
If Erdogan prevails in the end the result will be a system under which there’s no
prime minister, where the parliament will be weakened to the point of
being a rubber stamp, and the judiciary will become still more
subservient than it is already.
The path to one-man
rule—opponents talk of a “dictatorship”is the story of a politician
with a gut instinct for gaining power who’s seized on every political
setback that’s come his way in the past two years and turned it into an
opportunity to advance his ambitions. It is the people of Turkey who will suffer at the hands of this madman who will do anything for power. We are seeing Turkey going backwards towards a muslim Caliph in everything but name.
There are Turkish-Americans here in America who have contacted us here and asked us to begin coverage on what is happening in Turkey. So, we will begin to report on the political diatribe and Democratic regressions happening in Turkey for the near future.
1400 years of islamic history by a life long muslim
In 624, mohammed led a raid for treasure and slaves against a Meccan
caravan, killing 70 Meccans. Between 630 A.D. and
the death of mohammed in 632 A.D., muslims on at least one occasion
led by mohammed had murdered and conquered the bulk of western Arabia and southern
Palestine through, at least, a dozen separate invasions and bloody
conquests. These conquests were in large part disguised as holy wars or jihad. After, mohammed's death in 632, the new muslim
caliph, Abu Bakr, launched islam into almost 1,400 years of continual
murderous conquest and subjugation of all non-muslims
through invasion and war, a role Islam happily continues to this very day.
islamic laws Christians and Jews were made subject to over the years:
- Christians and Jews could not bear arms Muslims of course could
- Christians and Jews could not ride horses Muslims of course could could
- Christians and Jews had to get permission to build. Muslims did not
- Christians and Jews had to pay certain taxes which Muslims did not
- Christians could not proselytize Muslims were forced to by sharia law
- Christians and Jews had to bow to their Muslim masters when they paid their taxes.
- Christians and Jews had to live under the law set forth in the Koran, not under either their own religious or secular law.
The total numbers of murders directly attributed to islam for the last 1,400 years is currently 669 million murders and COUNTING!
80 million Christians
killed by Muslims in 500 years in the Balkan states, Hungary, Ukraine,
Russia. Then, we have the slaughter of non-muslims by muslims in India with the official estimate is 80 million. However, Muslim historian Firistha
wrote (in either Tarikh-i Firishta or the Gulshan-i Ibrahim) that
Muslims slaughtered over 400 million Hindus up to the peak of Islamic
rule of India, bringing the Hindu population down from 600 mil to 200
million at the time. In Africa an estimated death of about 120 million people dues to islam running a wholesale slave trade in Africa. Christians killed by islam is estimated at 120 million. Buddhists have suffered 10 million and counting deaths due directly to islam.
To those who say that islam is simply misunderstood is willfully ignorant of the truth. islam is a malignant cancer on humanity.
Wednesday, April 12, 2017
$400 Billion Broadband Scandal

The Book of Broken Promises goes from the
1990s through September 2014 and lays out all of the broken promises
that were used to charge you more money for services you never got!
By the end of 2014, America will have been charged about $400 billion
by the local phone incumbents, Verizon, AT&T and CenturyLink, for a
fiber optic future that never showed up. And though it varies by state,
counting the taxes, fees and surcharges that you have paid every month
(many of these fees are actually revenues to the company or taxes on the
company that you paid), it comes to about $4000-$5000.00 per household
from 1992-2014, and that’s the low number.
By year-end of 2010, and based on the commitments made by the phone
companies in their press statements, filings on the state and federal
level, and the state-based ‘alternative regulation’ plans that were put
in place to charge you for broadband upgrades of the telephone company
wire in your home, business, as well as the schools and libraries —
America, should have been the world’s first fully fibered, leading edge
broadband nation.
In fact, in 1992, the speed of broadband, as detailed in state laws,
was 45 Mbps in both directions — by 2014, all of us should have been
enjoying gigabit speeds (1000 Mbps).
Instead, America is not number 1 or 2 or 5 or even 10th in the world in broadband.
In 1993, Pacific Bell, California, said it would spend $16 billion by
2000 and have 5.5 million homes wired with fiber optics. Bell Atlantic
controlled the East Coast states from New Jersey through Virginia and
claimed it would spend $11 billion on 8.75 million homes by 2000, while
Ameritech (which included Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan and
Wisconsin) stated it would have 6 million fiber optic lines by 2000.
Some states, like New Jersey, would have 100% of Verizon New Jersey’s
territory completed by 2010 with 45 Mbps services in both directions,
while SNET (Connecticut) said it would spend $4.5 billion and have 100%
completed by 2007. Ohio Bell, (now AT&T Ohio) claimed that 100% of
schools and libraries would be upgraded to fiber by 2000. And US West,
(now Centurylink) which controls many western states, like Wyoming,
Idaho, Colorado or North Dakota, told the public, regulators and
investors that it would start a major deployment of fiber optic
services, adding ½ million households a year.almost every company filed to offer millions of customers services by 2000.
Starting in 1991, there were discussions of whether the government
should build these networks, but the phone companies who controlled the
state-based utilities in every state, saw this as a new mountain of
money and said — just give us a little more profit via deregulation.At this time, the companies’ wires were still monopoly controlled and
the networks were closed to competition, so their profits were
constrained to 12-14% a year. But, within literally a year after the
laws were changed, the profits more than doubled to about 30%
The Bell companies were also able to take massive tax write-offs. From
1993-1995, the companies took $25 billion in depreciation write offs. as the ink was dry on the new laws, the companies knew they would never
be held accountable to fulfill these commitments to do these upgrades of
the state utility networks; nothing was built, nothing was upgraded. At the end of 2004, America was to have 86 million households upgraded. And
by 2004, the phone companies had collected about $200 billion from
customers in excess phone charges and tax perks. Instead of upgrading the old, copper, legacy utility networks to fiber
optics, ALL of the companies pulled a bait and switch and around 1998 or
later, rolled out ADSL over these aging copper wires. It was slow and
it was considered an inferior product.
Tuesday, April 11, 2017
Autism is NOT a disease
What is a disease? A disease-label of any kind which has specific symptoms, a label is meant to make you think there is a specific condition. Is autism a disease with specific condition?
The Answer is no, because the diagnostic test for
autism does not exist. No physical test, no blood test, no saliva test, urine
test, no brain scan and currently, no genetic assay. Autism is listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders (DSM), as basically a list of possible behaviors. There is no
defining diagnostic test.
So, If a parent applies to the US federal vaccine court, for compensation, because her child was severely damaged by a vaccine, and if she or her doctor calls that damage “autism,” there is almost no chance the government will award her compensation. Because 'Autism' is NOT a disease.
Vaccines don’t cause autism because autism does not exist as a treatable condition. Legally, however, if the parent says her affected
child developed “encephalopathy”—a generalized term meaning a condition
that adversely affects the structure or function of the brain due to a vaccine then the
chances of receiving compensation increase. Can a parent of a neurologically damages child legally purport that a vaccine caused the encephalopathy? Legally, yes, because the law is all about word games
Because, neurological disease-labels in the DSM have no specific and defining diagnostic test(s), the condition, such as, 'Autism' can not legally exist. Yet, legally if the parent can proves a cause and effect from the vaccine to the neurological damage then the parent has legal grounds for compensation.
It is KNOWN legally that vaccine(s) cause brain damage in a certain percentage of children. This is why Federal law protects pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits by parents who claim that vaccines harmed their children.
The court ruled 6 to 2 that going before a special tribunal set up by Congress is the only way parents can be compensated for the negative side effects that in rare instances.
Isn't is AMAZING that federal regulators(Lawyers) and NOT Doctors are in the decision makers on whether vaccines are safe and properly designed.

Since there is ZERO conclusive evidence for the existence of autism as a specific condition. and there is ZERO defining diagnostic test the child's Parents (Plaintiff) cannot sue the vaccine makers. However, vaccines cause a laundry list of neurological and brain disorders. Since, it is known that vaccine(s) are the cause of these damages, it the legal term should be labeled as VACCINE DAMAGE, and compensation should be awarded on that basis.
The US government doesn’t want to admit that vaccines cause severe damage because the legal damages would be in the tens of billions. .So, the US government and the corporate lawyers utilize word games.

What, in real world action, causes neurological damage? A blow to the head, a fall, almost drowning in a pool, oxygen deprivation at birth, severe and long-term nutritional deficits, toxic pesticides, toxic medical drugs, and finally vaccines.

The vaccine makers use a shell game of names to disguise the neurological damages caused by vaccines. Such, as Fragile X syndrome, Asperger, Rett syndrome; Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, Intellectual Disability, and finally autism(which is NOT an actual disease).
If the parent plans to seek financial compensation for vaccine damage from the doctors and vaccine makers then it would be best to label the vaccine damage VACCINE DAMAGE, and forgo and allusions to 'Autism.'

This way the Neurological Vaccine Damage can be quantified and qualified by specific group(s) of nerve cells, nerve functions. Which, cascades into neurological deficiencies resulting physical, sociological, and neurological impairment.
Corporate researchers funded by vaccine makers claim that vaccines do not cause autism, because there are children diagnosed with autism who have never been vaccinated. That assertion is a hoax. The label and the definition of autism are worthless, to begin with, because there is no specific test that invariably diagnoses autism as it does not exist as a specific disease.
When a doctor tells a parent, “Your child has autism…” He’s really stating that the child has suffered neurological damage. The 'Catch all label' for vaccine induced neurological damage is Autism. The vaccine makers, backed by the US government are legally keeping the parent a parent with a vaccine-damaged child from successfully navigating the vaccine court. The vaccine court is essentially saying, “If you claim your child was damaged by a vaccine and call that damage autism, the court will deny monetary compensation. This goes back to the fact that Autism is not a disease listed in the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) by the AMA (American Medical Association) and as such in the court will arbitrarily decided that vaccines can’t cause autism because legally is does not exist.

//jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/04/10/assisted with some info in the article.
Because, neurological disease-labels in the DSM have no specific and defining diagnostic test(s), the condition, such as, 'Autism' can not legally exist. Yet, legally if the parent can proves a cause and effect from the vaccine to the neurological damage then the parent has legal grounds for compensation.
It is KNOWN legally that vaccine(s) cause brain damage in a certain percentage of children. This is why Federal law protects pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits by parents who claim that vaccines harmed their children.
The court ruled 6 to 2 that going before a special tribunal set up by Congress is the only way parents can be compensated for the negative side effects that in rare instances.
Isn't is AMAZING that federal regulators(Lawyers) and NOT Doctors are in the decision makers on whether vaccines are safe and properly designed.
Since there is ZERO conclusive evidence for the existence of autism as a specific condition. and there is ZERO defining diagnostic test the child's Parents (Plaintiff) cannot sue the vaccine makers. However, vaccines cause a laundry list of neurological and brain disorders. Since, it is known that vaccine(s) are the cause of these damages, it the legal term should be labeled as VACCINE DAMAGE, and compensation should be awarded on that basis.
The US government doesn’t want to admit that vaccines cause severe damage because the legal damages would be in the tens of billions. .So, the US government and the corporate lawyers utilize word games.
What, in real world action, causes neurological damage? A blow to the head, a fall, almost drowning in a pool, oxygen deprivation at birth, severe and long-term nutritional deficits, toxic pesticides, toxic medical drugs, and finally vaccines.

The vaccine makers use a shell game of names to disguise the neurological damages caused by vaccines. Such, as Fragile X syndrome, Asperger, Rett syndrome; Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, Intellectual Disability, and finally autism(which is NOT an actual disease).
If the parent plans to seek financial compensation for vaccine damage from the doctors and vaccine makers then it would be best to label the vaccine damage VACCINE DAMAGE, and forgo and allusions to 'Autism.'
This way the Neurological Vaccine Damage can be quantified and qualified by specific group(s) of nerve cells, nerve functions. Which, cascades into neurological deficiencies resulting physical, sociological, and neurological impairment.
Corporate researchers funded by vaccine makers claim that vaccines do not cause autism, because there are children diagnosed with autism who have never been vaccinated. That assertion is a hoax. The label and the definition of autism are worthless, to begin with, because there is no specific test that invariably diagnoses autism as it does not exist as a specific disease.
When a doctor tells a parent, “Your child has autism…” He’s really stating that the child has suffered neurological damage. The 'Catch all label' for vaccine induced neurological damage is Autism. The vaccine makers, backed by the US government are legally keeping the parent a parent with a vaccine-damaged child from successfully navigating the vaccine court. The vaccine court is essentially saying, “If you claim your child was damaged by a vaccine and call that damage autism, the court will deny monetary compensation. This goes back to the fact that Autism is not a disease listed in the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) by the AMA (American Medical Association) and as such in the court will arbitrarily decided that vaccines can’t cause autism because legally is does not exist.

//jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/04/10/assisted with some info in the article.
Monday, April 10, 2017
Sweden Attacked Yet Again by muslim attacker...leaving only Swedish Victims
Last week in Stockholm, Sweden 4 people killed and 15 wounded in a truck attack perpetrated by a muslim immigrant. The muslim immigrant is 39-year-old Uzbekistan
national Rakhmat Akilov, Rakhmat with murderous forethought drove his truck at high speed directly into a crowded area outside
an upscale department store in central Stockholm on Friday. The four
people killed included two Swedes, a British man and a Belgian woman.
The Swedish police arrested the man on Friday night after the attack, dragging him from his hijacked beer truck. The 39-year-old
Uzbek whose Swedish residency application was rejected last year. Police said the truck attack suspect was known as a member of islamic extremist organizations.
So, the Swedish police knew that Rakhmat Akilov, a muslim extremist hates the west, hates Democracy, and hates the Swedish people. So, instead of removing him and all those like him (muslim extremist) from Sweden the Prime Minister of Sweden gives a meaningless statement...Prime Minister Stefan Lofven said "the whole of Sweden" sympathized with the families and friends of the victims." He might as well as said nothing. Why is it that the Swedish people do not wake up to the fact that they are in mortal danger. In 2015, a record 163,000 asylum-seekers arrived in the country; the highest per capita rate in Europe.

When the birth rate of muslims in Sweden exceed the birth rate of natural Swedes it is only an inevitability that muslims will seize control of the Swedish govermment through sheer numbers at the voting booth. Then, Sweden the once...'Most peaceful country in Europe' will be nothing but a memory.
Friday, April 07, 2017
Tuesday, April 04, 2017
The United States F35 Boondoggle
There are literally hundreds of critical performance deficiencies and maintenance
problems for the USA's F35 fighter program. It is believed that the F-35A's
ability to succeed either as an air-to-air or an air-to-ground fighter is very low.
In an analysis of the report at the Straus Military Reform Project, list the following factors:

The problem with the wing design leaves the F-35 a
challenge to fly at around the speed of sound: “All F-35 variants
display objectionable or unacceptable flying qualities at transonic
speeds, where aerodynamic forces on the aircraft are rapidly changing.
Particularly, under elevated 'g' conditions, when wing loading causes
the effects to be more pronounced, pilots have reported the flying
qualities as extremely poor.
Further more the Electro-Optical Targeting System suffers from low
resolution and short range. Which, means if pilots are trying to single out a
ground target, they have to fly far to close to be able to deploy guided munitions. This eliminates stealth approach opening the pilot to ground fire.

To over come the loss of stealth the use of the F35 cannon is recommended by manufacture. The problem is currently the cannon does NOT work.
To maintain its sleek radar profile, the F-35A
has a door to conceal the gun. Good idea, bad execution, because if the F35 open's it's cannon doors the wind drag forces the F35 out of it's flight path. The developers say this is a software problem, the pilots say its a hardware issue.
The F-35's software is a nightmare of code failures and patchwork. The most current F35 version, the December Block
3FR6 release, has MAJOR software issues, which could take a decade or more to iron out. . Add to that the cannon sighting problem, the “Air-to-Air Range
Infrastructure” remains woefully behind schedule.
Even if the cannon were somehow usable, it's not much help in
a ground support mission, because the F-35s can only
load up with a couple of hundred rounds barely enough for 2-3 ground targets at best.
Flight testing “continues to be a source of
significant flight failures. Most embarrassingly for the manufacturer there are fatigue
problems in the tail; the arresting gear on the F-35A variant is good
for one landing only (DID you get that the F35 which costs 110 MILLION per plane can only land once then must be repaired)
Then, the F-35A and F-35C show excessively high air flow
temperatures around the engine; and the horizontal tail overheats in a
Mach 1.5 run, which is totally unacceptable for a 5th generation fighter.
The F-35C is also problematic when launched from an
aircraft carrier: “Vertical oscillations during F-35C catapult launches
were reported by pilots as excessive, violent, causing major physical discomfort to the pilots.
Sunday, April 02, 2017
DEA are Criminals with a Badge
The Drug Enforcement Administration takes billions of dollars in cash from people who are never charged with criminal activity, according to a report issued today by the Justice Department’s Inspector General.
Since 2007, the report found, the DEA has seized more than $4 billion in cash from people suspected of involvement with the drug trade. But 81 percent of those seizures, totaling $3.2 billion, were conducted administratively, meaning no civil or criminal charges were brought against the owners of the cash and no judicial review of the seizures ever occurred.
That total does not include the dollar value of other seized assets, like cars, homes, electronics and clothing.
These seizures are all legal under the controversial practice of civil asset forfeiture, which allows authorities to take cash, contraband and property from people suspected of crime. But the practice does not require authorities to obtain a criminal conviction, and it allows departments to keep seized cash and property for themselves unless individuals successfully challenge the forfeiture in court. Critics across the political spectrum say this creates a perverse profit motive, incentivizing police to seize goods not for the purpose of fighting crime, but for padding department budgets.
In the absence of this information, the report examined 100 DEA cash seizures that occurred “without a court-issued warrant and without the presence of narcotics, the latter of which would provide strong evidence of related criminal behavior.”
Fewer than half of those seizures were related to a new or ongoing criminal investigation, or led to an arrest or prosecution, the Inspector General found.
“When seizure and administrative forfeitures do not ultimately advance an investigation or prosecution,” the report concludes, “law enforcement creates the appearance, and risks the reality, that it is more interested in seizing and forfeiting cash than advancing an investigation or prosecution.”

The scope of asset forfeiture is staggering. Since 2007 the Department of Justice’s Asset Forfeiture Fund, which collects proceeds from seized cash and other property, has ballooned to $28 billion. In 2014 alone authorities seized $5 billion in cash and property from people — greater than the value of all documented losses to burglary that year.
Some of the encounters were based on tips from confidential sources working in the travel industry, a number of whom have received large sums of money in exchange for their cooperation. In one case, officers targeted an individual for questioning on a tip from a travel industry informant that the individual had paid for a plane ticket with a pre-paid debit card and cash.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
