
Tuesday, March 14, 2017
Monday, March 06, 2017
The Death kneel of FRANCE
The Death of France begun five decades ago. In the 1960s, after the war in Algeria, President Charles de Gaulle directed the country toward closer relations with Arab and Muslim states.
Migratory flows of "guest workers(muslims)" from Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia,
which had started a few years earlier, sharply increased. Immigrants
were not encouraged to integrate. Everyone assumed they would return
home at the end of their employment contracts. They were settled in the
outskirts of big cities. The economy was dynamic, with strong job
creation. All seemed well on the surface, but the French did not understand islam. The French could not comprehend the virulent spread of muslims like cancer across France at a rate not seen since the black death.
Twenty years later the contagion of islam and it's corrosive effects
became painfully obvious. The unchecked muslim immigrants now numbered in the millions. muslims from
sub-Saharan Africa joined those coming from Arab nations. Neighborhoods
made up of just Arabs and Africans were stealthy formed. The economy had slowed
down and massive unemployment settled in. Because of French social spending the jobless muslims did
not go back home, instead relying on social benefits.
Although many of these new arrivals had become French
citizens, they were resentful of France and the West. Political
agitators started teaching them to attack and destroy Western civilization. Violent
gangs of young Arabs and Africans began to intimidate the police. Clashes with police
were common. Often, when a gang member was wounded, political agitators
would help to incite more violence.
Because the French had no backbone the situation swiftly spun out of control.
In 1984, a movement called SOS Racisme was created by Trotskyist militants, and began to define any criticism of immigration as "racist". Major leftist parties supported
SOS Racism. They learned from the American Democrats that by accusing their political
opponents of racism, they could attract the votes of blacks and muslims. The
presence of Islamist agitators, alongside agitators in Arab and African
neighborhoods, plus the emergence of anti-Western Islamic discourse,
alarmed many observers. SOS Racisme immediately declared that ANY who
spoke against muslims and blacks were both Islamophobic and racists.
In 1990, a law drafted by a Communist lawmaker, Jean-Claude Gayssot, was passed.
It stipulated that "any discrimination based on ethnicity, nation, race
or religion is prohibited." Since then, this law has been used to criminalize and SILENCE
any criticism of Arab and African delinquency, any question on
immigration from the Muslim world, any negative analysis of Islam. Many
writers have been fined, and most "politically incorrect" books on those
topics have disappeared from bookshops. This is FASCISM in it's rawest form.
The French government demanded the media to obey the "Gayssot law." It
also had FRENCH history textbooks be rewritten to include chapters on
the crimes committed by the West against Muslims, and on the "essential contribution" of Islam to humanity. So, not only was FRENCH history being re-written, absolute lies about the contribution of islam to FRANCE was added as well.
In 2002, the situation in the country became dramatic.
Arab and African neighborhoods had NOW become "no-go zones." Radical
Islam was widespread and Islamist attacks began. Dozens of cars would be
torched each week. Muslim anti-Semitism
was rising rapidly and led to an increase in anti-Jewish attacks. SOS
Racisme and other anti-racist organizations were silent on Muslim
anti-Semitism. Unwilling to be accused of "Islamophobic racism,"
organizations tasked with fighting against anti-Semitism were beaten into submission. islamic FEAR is the new political language in FRANCE. Just like in every other country that islam has infiltrated VIOLENCE is the only thing islam has to contribute.
A book, The Lost Territories of the Republic, by Georges
Bensoussan (under the pen-name "Emmanuel Brenner"), was released. It
depicted accurately what was going on. It spoke of the sweeping hatred
for the West among young people of muslim origin, and of the
full-blown hatred of Jews among young Muslims. It said that "no-go
zones" were on the edge of secession and no longer a part of French
territory. The mainstream media out of FEAR of muslim reprisals deliberately ignored the book.
Three years later, in October 2005, riots broke out across the country.
More than 9,000 cars were torched by muslims. Hundreds of stores, supermarkets and
shopping centers were looted and destroyed by muslims. Dozens of police officers
were seriously injured by muslims. See a pattern developing?
The violent uprising of muslims in FRANCE only stopped when the government begged for an
agreement to make peace with Muslim associations.
Today in 2017 FRANCE as a western nation has fallen. All Democratic power in FRANCE has now been surrendered to the barbaric hoards of muslim invaders. islam, is a festering disease, which knows only one word...violence.
France's one last hope is Marine Le Pen’s Front National. She is running for a leadership role in Frances government. The globalists want her dead. She is the last French politician with the will to stand against the total islamic overthrow of France. She is also 100% for Frances exit from the European Union. As you can imagine her life is in great danger...
obama should be indicted
Obama and his Department of Justice maliciously and criminally
misused the FISA process to collect intelligence on Presidential
candidate Donald J. Trump. Additionally, Obama personally relaxed the
limitations on how such information collected could be disseminated in
the weeks before leaving office.
The political ramifications from this, if proved correct, could be unprecedented in scope. Once fully exposed, it would explain the curious actions of Obama as he prepared to vacate the White House. It would also explain, in context, the actions and statements of not only Barack Hussein Obama, but others in key positions of power including Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, John Brennan, and others within the media.
Obama’s insistence to secure a federal
wiretap warrant of Donald J. Trump, the candidate, using the federal
court system as the mechanism to do so. The ostensible probable cause
was alleged ties between Donald J. Trump and/or his associates with
Russia.
The first warrant application was made in June 2016,
according to reports published by The New York Times and elsewhere, but
was rejected due to the lack of probable cause of criminal activity.
When
the request was denied in regular federal court, Obama and his Justice
Department attempted an “end around” by citing the existence of a
“foreign actor” and made a similar surveillance warrant application
through the more specialized Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
(FISA) court in October of 2016. According to published reports, that
warrant application was rejected as well, a rare occurrence in the FISA
venue, which strengthens claims that no evidence of any foreign
involvement ever existed. It has been reported that the initial warrant
application to the FISA court specifically named Donald J. Trump.
It
is also relevant to note here that this is the type of activity that
led to the creation of the infamous “Wall” that was referenced after the
9/11 attacks. Its relevance to this specific instance is explained well
by former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy in this January 11, 2017 column.
|
Apparently undeterred, the Obama Justice Department submitted yet another application to the FISA court, this time omitting the name of Donald J. Trump and submitting it as a FISA specific case. The FISA court reportedly approved the application under the new and more narrow scope. Specifically, ties to two Russian banks: Russia’s SV bank and Alfa Bank. The alleged target was a computer server reportedly situated inside the Trump Tower.
Based on the lack of action consequential to that warrant and wiretap, it has been stated (and can be reasonably determined) that no actionable evidence was found.
Shortly before leaving office, Obama expanded the power of the National Security Agency (NSA) as detailed in the unclassified document titled Procedures for the Availability or Dissemination of Raw Signals Intelligence Information by the National Security Agency (NSA). As detailed in that document, limitations were changed on what the NSA could do with the information they collected through their surveillance operations. These changes effectively relaxed the restrictions on the dissemination of information collected on private citizens by broadening the access to such information.
It is also notable that on January 3, 2017, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch signed off on rule changes for phone taps.
It appears that President Trump has been provided the evidence of a paper trail leading to a FISA court that substantiates his assertions that Barack Hussein Obama, working in concert with others including those wielding the full might and power of various federal agencies, improperly obtained authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign under the pretense of a national security investigation, and continued such monitoring beyond its tenuous scope even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found.
This is as serious as it gets.
repost:http://canadafreepress.com/article/this-is-as-serious-as-it-gets?utm
Sunday, March 05, 2017
Wikileaks reveales documents proving that Obama has a history of wiretapping his adversaries
In one Wikileaks document, Obama bugged a meeting
between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor, Angela
Merkel. Obama also bugged a call between then French president,
Sarkozy and Merkel. These are the bugged phones we know about. How far did obama go in the name of a Clinton Democratic victory?
If you listened to obama's defense of the wiretapping which occurred at Trump tower before the 2017 presidential election you can clearly hear obama use legal language to distance himself from any responsibility. Which, means that he KNOWS wire tapping occured at Trump tower, but he is some how insulated from the crime.

President Obama’s spokesman Kevin Lewis denied that the former White
House or the former President himself would have given such an order to
wiretap Trump Tower, or any other type of surveillance in any case, but
that such an order COULD have come from an “independent investigation
led by the Department of Justice.”
Where there is smoke there is Fire...
Former Obama administration officials Do Not Deny that such a wiretap
existed. They just deny that the White House or Obama himself would
have approved it or ordered it, and say that the Department of Justice
would have sought it in consultation with a foreign intelligence
surveillance, or FISA, court.
Obama’s former speechwriter Jon Favreau tweeted that he would warn reporters against saying there was no wiretap.
The legal term obama is using to defend himself is the same one Nixon used...
"Plausible Deniability."
Saturday, March 04, 2017
The French have been invaded

If the French people do not rally to their own flag they will soon bow before a Caliph, a semi-french supreme religious and political leader. The new French islamic state known as the French-Caliphate.
Sunday, February 26, 2017
Saturday, February 25, 2017
Thursday, February 23, 2017
7th floor of the Washington DC Department of State
The term “shadow government” is not a construct of critics;
it’s actually the term the professional bureaucrats within the 7th floor
of the Washington DC based Department of State gave to themselves (see Image Below).
The career political operatives who reign within the State Department
openly view themselves as a distinctly separate state governing
authority, with no attachment to the policies or objectives of the
United States or any mere elected official therein.
For decades this group has considered themselves “the untouchables”.
They live a life of high financed indulgence including: massive expense accounts, chartered airline travel, swanky cocktail parties, expense chauffeurs to take their kids to private school, seasonally designed home decor – appointed by only the very best interior designers, personal security to keep the commoners away, tickets to the best venues and reserved seating at elite DC restaurants.

With first rights to the budget expenditures, the 7th floor group finds no indulgence too extravagant for their intellectual elitism. They demand nothing but the finest because they are the most worthy of the DC professionally privileged – who are more equal than others; and after all, their jobs require them to host and visit like-minded diplomats, and celebrities with exclusive tastes from around the world.
President Donald Trump has done something NO politician, left of right, has ever done. He fired them all...
Much of seventh-floor untouchable ELITE, who work for the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources and the Counselor offices, were told today that their services were no longer needed.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
Freedom rings loudly in New Hampshire

Freedom rings loudly in New Hampshire! It is now legal to carry a concealed firearm without a license in the state of New Hampshire.
Governor Chris Sununu signed the constitutional carry bill, Senate Bill 12,
into law Wednesday morning. Effective immediately, law abiding gun
owners in New Hampshire will no longer be required to obtain a permit to
carry concealed handguns.
“It is common-sense legislation,” Sununu said at a ceremony in the
Executive Council chambers. “This is about making sure that our laws on
our books are keeping people safe while remaining true to the
live-free-or-die spirit.”

Many supporters cheered as the bill was signed, and the NRA has applauded the signing, urging supporters to thank Gov. Sununu and legislators who worked to get the bill passed.
I would like to personally thank Governor Sununu and all the freedom loving legislators who worked so diligently to get the bill passed!
Many supporters argued the old permit process, in which gun owners
had to apply for concealed carry permits through their local police
chiefs, was too lengthy and subjective.

Because of political beliefs and anti-constitutional Police Chiefs there has been an substantial abuse of the current statutes by various police departments," said Republican Rep. JR Hoell.
Weaponized Text
MSNBC host says it is their "job to control what people think." The paid talking heads at the infotainment outlets just showed their hands. Remember all Media in the united States is owned by 6 companies. These 6 companies are run and owned by 14 Billionaires. ALL of your infotainment news is crafted, filtered, and neutered by the will of these men.
Julian Assange said it best...
'When You Read a Newspaper Article, watch a mainstream news show, or listen to public broadcasting radio You Are Reading, watching, listening to Weaponized Text.'
Here are the men who tell you what to think in America today
Michael Bloomberg - Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Media
Rupert Murdoch - News Corp
Donald and Samuel "Si" Newhouse
Cox Family - Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Jeff Bezos - The Washington Post
John Henry - The Boston Globe
Sheldon Adelson - The Las Vegas Review-Journal
Joe Mansueto - Inc. and Fast Company magazines
Mortimer Zuckerman - US News & World Report, New York Daily News
Barbey family - Village Voice
Stanley Hubbard – Hubbard Broadcasting
Patrick Soon-Shiong - Tribune Publishing Co.
Carlos Slim Helu - The New York Times
Warren Buffett - regional daily papers
Monday, February 20, 2017
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) SECRET Operation Choke Point
The U.S. federal bureaucracy doesn’t often admit wrongdoing. This time it took a change in the political landscape, many businesses threatening legal action and a congressman with a background in banking to force the bureaucracy to admit to misconduct and to stop financial attacks on legal businesses that the Obama administration deems to be politically incorrect.
This week the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) published a statement saying they are instituting changes to stop Operation Choke Point’s discriminatory practices against legal businesses. The U.S. Justice Department still contends that Operation Choke Point is an initiative designed to reduce unlawful fraud by “choking” illegal players out of U.S. financial institutions. However, under direction of the FDIC, Operation Choke Point also affected the banking relationships of many legal businesses, including those of gun stores and other firearms-related companies. Some law-abiding businesses had their long-standing banking relationships terminated as a result of threats from the FDIC to censure financial institutions that do business with gun stores and other firearms-related businesses. Some examples of legal businesses being harmed were included in a report by the House Oversight Committee; still more examples were documented in research done by The Heritage Foundation’s The Daily Signal.
Operation Choke Point was an operation through which the Department of Justice was using various agencies/services under its power to pressure banks and credit companies to cut ties with “high risk” businesses. Not ironically, gun and ammunition sellers were categorized as “high risk.”
The letter from the FDIC says, “The FDIC is aware that some institutions may be hesitant to provide certain types of banking services due to concerns that they will be unable to comply with the associated requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)….” As a result, the FDIC says it is now “encourage[ing] institutions to take a risk-based approach in assessing individual customer relationships rather than declining to provide banking services to entire categories of customers….”
U.S. Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.), who was once a bank regulator for the state of Missouri and who now is a member of the House Financial Services Committee, released a statement after a meeting with FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg and Vice Chairman Tom Hoenig, that said in part: “After a year of mounting pressure from Congress and outside organizations like the National Shooting Sports Foundation, top officials from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation finally acknowledged their involvement and wrongdoing in Operation Choke Point.

While I am very pleased the FDIC will put in place new polices and change the culture at the agency, there is still work to be done, specifically with the Department of Justice. I am pleased the National Shooting Sports Foundation supports my legislation, the Financial Institution Customer Protection Act, and I have no doubt the foundation will remain steadfast in educating its members and continuing the fight in ending Operation Choke Point once and for all.”
The FDIC will now require bank examiners to put any recommendation to end a banking relationship in writing. The bank examiner also must explain what law or regulation they believe is or was being violated.
During the investigation by Congress emails surfaced showing FDIC investigators “scheming to influence banks’ decisions on who to do business … [to ensure] banks ‘get the message’ about the businesses the regulators don’t like, and pressuring banks to cut credit or close those accounts, effectively discouraging entire industries.”
“The FDIC has ILLEGALLY allowed a culture within their agency to blossom that they believe it’s okay to impose their personal opinions and value system in a regulatory way. They are not a regulatory police—their job is to enforce the law.”

The FDIC admitted wrongdoing and is making administrative changes, but—as in the scandal within the IRS—the public is pushing for legislation to make certain another administration doesn’t use the FDIC to attack businesses it doesn’t like—what if, for example, a Republican administration used the FDIC to attack the finances of Planned Parenthood?
The bill would also create a legal path for citizens to take action against banks or regulatory institutions that terminate their banking relationships for ideological reasons.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/frankminiter/2015/01/30/fdic-admits-to-strangling-legal-gun-stores-banking-relationships/#5459f99327fd
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

