Chinese Heros of the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake

WTC 7 is the Smoking Gun

Fact: The BBC Reported the Collapse of WTC Building 7 twenty three minutes before it's collapse.  Seven minutes before the collapse the BBC reported WTC Building 7 a second time.  

WTC Building 7 was never hit by an airplane. There is absolutely no evidence of any structural  damage. Yet seven hours after the Twin Towers collapsed, this 47-storey building collapsed in a few seconds. 

 

 Almost immediately, the evidence of a massive crime, thousands of tonnes of steel from the building were taken away to be melted down in the Far East.

 There was ZERO investigation as to why the ONLY modern skyscraper in history, simply fell down in it's footprint, at free fall speed was ever conducted.   

The official explanation, which can only be believed is all the law of physics are ignored, is that WTC 7 Trade Center collapsed because of ordinary fires. This is an impossibility, WTC 7 was over engineered for just such an event.  Just, as WTC 1 and 2 were engineered to withstand not 1, but 2 separate strikes by a 747.   

 

Yet, if we are to believe that WTC 7 fell at freefall speed because of 2 small fires, it makes WTC 7 the first and only skyscraper in the world to have collapsed because of fire.

Then, again is that was true why are the survivors and victims of 9/11 not suing the Architectural firm who built the WTC complex?  After all, that means that WTC 7 was not built up to New York building code.  

The real smoking gun for WTC 7 will always be the BBC reporting on it's collapse 20 minutes before it fell. I personally, believe that those who orchestrated 9/11 were so confident in their complete and total control that they demonstrated their power by  announcing their crime before the worldwide public. 

 I think it also telling that British Prime Minister Tony Blair, at a committee meeting was caught speaking when he thought his microphone was off he said..."WTC 7 was an obvious demolition job." 

 

Donald Trump aka Bozo the Clown

Donald Trump is being touted as the every man's friend.  Donald Trump is solely being used by those behind the scenes to split the Republican vote.  All of this is being orchestrated so that the vile bowel effluence that is known as Hillary Clinton, will be elected. 

After all, Hillary Clinton when viewed in the normal light of sanity is angry, divisive, rabidly anti-American and power hungry on a scale that would make Caligula blush.  However, take the same odorously fowl stench named Hilly Clinton and stack her next to the wack job, bouffant hairdo, ego maniac  Donald Trump and she, the devil's servant, seems the better of two bad choices. 

OMG! 

It's like the bitter 1991 Louisiana gubernatorial runoff between state Rep. David Duke and three-term governor Edwin Edwards all over again. On one side you have Hitler and the other you have Al Capone. 

Only now we have Donald Trump aka Bozo the Clown in a suit; versus an infected, angry, open sore aka Hillary Clinton.  ( I personally apologize to angry, infected, open sores for comparing them to Hillary Clinton.) 

Americans are slaves with absolutely no say in the electoral process.  Most disenfranchised American know that the whole Presidential election is a sham.  Every President since before Nixon has had to go to the Elites and be vetted. Nixon said of Bohemian Grove that it was a bunch of Fags running around worshiping some crazy owl statue. 

 

In 1992 election, they elected Bill Clinton by running Ross Perot in order to split the Republican vote. If Perot hadn't run, Bush Sr. would have been re-elected. It is widely held that Bush Sr angered the hidden powers that be by referring to their total control of Capitol Hill. Perot got 20 million votes. Clinton got 45 million and Bush got 39 million.  

Americans are manipulated, lied to, fed meaningless drivel, never in danger of being any where near a meaningful discussion with a Presidential candidate.  Every American knows that anything coming out of a Presidential candidate is a bold face lie.  The last time a real, red blooded, American President tried to change the system, to serve the people, he was assassinated in Dallas in 1963. Now, we have moron's like this...

 

The entire American political drama that is the Presidential race is nothing more then an exercise in futility, for it is a foregone conclusion who will win and who will lose.  No matter who wins the next Presidential race it will be the America who loses. 

 

Donald Trump is an Illuminati

agent tasked with getting

Hillary Clinton elected. 

- See more at: http://www.henrymakow.com/#sthash.69NgnFhM.dpuf

End the Fed

 

Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R., Texas) said the Federal Reserve is “willfully ignoring” a congressional subpoena for documents in regards to an investigation of a Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) leak in 2012, at a House Financial Services Committee hearing on Wednesday.

 

The Fed has recently crossed the line by ignoring a lawful congressional subpoena for documents,” said Hensarling, the committee’s chairman. “This is inexcusable and unsupported by legal precedents. It cannot be allowed to stand."

The Fed’s refusal to appear before Congress threatens to reveal that Congress is the lesser power between the two.  Congress is afraid of how it looks when the issue a subpoena and it is ignored.   If any citizen, political figure, or business entity of the United States ignored a Congressional subpoena it would result in immediate imprisonment.  

 The Fed is ABSOLUTELY above the law and has been since December 23rd 1923.

 

 If you want to know who runs the world, it is the behind the scenes power brokers who can blithely ignore Congressional subpoena with impunity.  Make no mistake, the Federal Reserve Bank is the ruling body of the United States of America. The World Bank is the Ruling body of the global politic.

Political Theater

 

South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley’s response to the Charleston massacre, highlighted by her call to remove the Confederate flag from statehouse grounds, has thrust her back into the national spotlight and re-ignited talk about what role she might play in the 2016 race. 



WOW! That's amazing a Mass shooting by an ANGRY white person just before the Presidential elections.  GEE WIZZ what are the odd...?

Not only is she poised to be a powerful surrogate, but already there's chatter she could make a solid running mate for one of the 16 expected Republican presidential candidates. 

"She’d be on anybody’s list,” former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee told Fox News on Tuesday. “She’s done a terrific job in South Carolina.”Haley has been a high-profile Republican since she won the governorship as part of the 2010 Tea Party wave. 

But her call to remove the Confederate battle flag after a white gunman fatally shot nine black victims June 17 inside an historic African-American church in Charleston, S.C., saw her play a national leadership role in the party as prominent GOP figures joined her. 

GEE GOLLY! A female, white, Republican who might be able to draw minority voters into the Republican party right before a coming Presidential election.  Boy, that sure is lucky for the Republicans.  What are the odds...?

 

The Republican National Committee, South Carolina's U.S. senators and several 2016 GOP candidates also called for the flag's removal -- despite many Southerners’ belief that the flag is part of their heritage, not a symbol of white supremacy. 
Haley, an Indian-American and the state’s first female governor, insists her call to remove the flag was deeply personal and beyond politics, repeatedly telling reporters she couldn’t “look her children in the face” while allowing the flag to fly. 

BE STILL MY BEATING HEART...I feel a tear forming... She ACTUALLY couldn't look at her children. Notice, how though she goes by WHITE they mention that she is an AMERICAN INDIAN.  

In a presidential campaign season, the political implications are unavoidable. 


Sure is a lucky thing that an angry WHITE man killed a bunch of minorities in a Church where Michelle obama has friends AND there is a WHITE (American Indian, if it will get the votes)  FEMALE, REPUBLICAN who might be electable in the coming Presidential election.  What are the odds in that...? 

 

 
Juleanne Glover, who has worked on Republican presidential campaigns for Arizona Sen. John McCain and Steve Forbes and is now a senior adviser for the international firm Teneo Strategy, agrees that Haley could be a top vice presidential pick.

But she also argues Haley could play a far bigger role in the White House race that would begin much earlier than when candidates pick a running mate in summer 2016.


OMG!!! What a wind fall for the Republican's who have been struggling with bringing the minority vote that a crazy WHITE man shot up a black church in a state with a WHITE (American Indian, if it will get the votes)  FEMALE, REPUBLICAN who just can't bare the thought of pandering to whites any longer.
  
Glover suggested Tuesday that Haley’s backing and physical presence at campaign stops across early-voting South Carolina could make or break a candidate’s White House bid.

Sure is lucky that the REPUBLICANS had this wind fall. Now, the  REPUBLICAN PARTY can stop looking so old and white and attract minority voters using a WHITE (American Indian, if it will get the votes)  FEMALE, REPUBLICAN who just can't face her children.  I think I feel another tear forming...

 

ISIS an American Creation

ISIS is entirely a creation of the United States’ behavior in Iraq. When the U.S. first invaded Iraq, it blew the country apart. By destroying the existing government, toppling Saddam Hussein, and destroying the infrastructure, the U.S. left behind a power vacuum that would never have existed under Hussein. The impact caused by the actions of the United States is a historical fact that media just won’t discuss. 

This has to do with U.S. action in the region, which destroyed the infrastructure, which destroyed Iraq society, which destroyed the Iraqi government, while there were a lot of people who weren’t “as happy as larks” while living under Saddam Hussein, they also weren’t at odds with Hussein in the same way they were with the government established by the U.S. The militant group ISIS was formed as a small insurgent group in Iraq in 2006. While they tried to create problems for the U.S. military, they had no money and no real ability to recruit.


 It wasn’t until 2009 that ISIS shifted its focus from Iraq, where it was largely unsuccessful in developing a foothold, and focused on the civil war in Syria. While in Syria, ISIS still struggled to gain a foothold. This is attributed to the fact that two larger groups fighting against President Bashar al-Assad were overpowering them: al-Nusra Front – or al-Qaeda – and the Free Syrian Army. 

Then, came a pivotal moment that most Americans aren’t even aware of. In June 2013, a Northern General for the Free Syrian Army spoke out on Al Jazeera Qatar and stated that if international forces did not send weapons, the rebels attempting to overthrow Syrian president Bashar al-Assad would lose their war within a month. The U.S. was covertly funding Syrian rebels. 

 

Although Obama acted as if he was proceeding with caution, politicians such as Senator John McCain demanded action. Within a matter of weeks of the Syrian general making his plea for international help, the U.S., the Saudis, Jordan, Qatar, Turkey and Israel began providing weapons, training and money to so-called rebel groups like the Free Syrian Army. In September 2013, American media outlets began reporting that weapons were being given to Syrian rebels. CNN reported that while the weapons are not “American-made,” they were “funded and organized by the CIA.” 

However, things began to fall apart when less than one year after the U.S. supplied Syrian “freedom fighters” with weapons, those weapons ended up in the hands of ISIS fighters. Those ISIS fighters came from the group McCain insisted would help the U.S. overthrow Assad: the Free Syrian Army. The army was not only sending the Islamic State weapons, it was also sending them fighters. It wasn’t until June 2014 that ISIS went from being a “no-name group in Syria” to a group that was “heavily armed and trained by U.S. and Coalition Special Forces.” 

 

This revitalized group made a dramatic entrance by crossing back over the Syrian border into Iraq and capturing Mosul and much of the northern part of the country. One of the most important facts that mainstream media ignores time and time again is that ISIS was able to grow so fast, because of all the U.S. military equipment they were able to seize – equipment that the US military left in Iraq. 

 

Truckloads of Humvees, tanks and weaponry that instead of taking or destroying, the U.S. government simply decided to leave behind. However, even when the U.S. government became aware that ISIS fighters were capturing U.S. equipment, it did nothing. 

 

The lack of action attributed to the fact that ISIS fighters were taking the equipment back into Syria to continue fighting Assad, which was what the U.S. government wanted. How is it that the United States, with all of its intelligence capabilities, didn’t know this threat was coming? How many billions did the US spend, maybe a hundred billion on total intelligence community budge over the year? How did they have no idea?” 

 

The U.S. did know who ISIS was, but the so-called Islamic State was doing what the Obama administration wanted. The ISIS fighters continued to do what the Obama administration wanted, and in late summer 2014, they were labeled the new boogeyman in the war on terror. Over the past few months, the U.S. government, who acted like they had never even heard of ISIS, suddenly, with the help of media has turned the Islamic State into the new focus of the war on terror. Now, as ISIS has continued its rise, recruitment is exploding and the group is becoming stunningly wealthy.


ISIS makes $2 million a day off of selling oil, and the United States’ response, of “undercutting the competition” by blowing up oil fields makes no sense. Why is the U.S., which is known for sanctioning anything that moves, when it’s angry, is not placing sanctions on the banks or the oil companies that are involved? 

 In addition to those questions, Americans should also be asking, Why is the U.S. sending $500 million to the Free Syrian Army to fight ISIS when the FSA is one of the biggest suppliers of fighters and weapons to ISIS? and Why is the US sending new and more powerful weapons to the FSA like anti-aircraft missiles – weapons that we know will be in the hands of ISIS? 

The mainstream media will say that ISIS is the “creation of American inaction,” the reality is that they are the “product of direct action.” This direct action started with “the action of creating a power vacuum in Iraq” and manifested into the “arming violent Jihadist, hoping they would overthrow a leader in a neighboring Middle Eastern country.”

 The U.S. government is a victim of its own insane policies, due to the fact that it is very good at blowing things up, but really bad at putting them back together. 


Thanks to HBH91

Hannity Asks Is the gay marriage ruling an attack on Christianity

Democratic Senator says..."That religious protection offered by the Constitution ONLY for religious institutions."  Which, means that individuals will not have the right to disagree with the far left homosexual agenda.  Business owners will NOT be afforded religious exemptions from having the nefarious gay agenda forced upon them by threat of finical ruin or even jail. 

Humanity's homosexual guest Brian Silva says that the baking company who did not want to bake a cake for a same sex marriage should be either forced by threat of incarceration or finical ruin to bake the cake.  So, there is no room in America any longer for Christians. Now, either Christians go along quietly with the new homosexual agenda or they will be imprisoned or financially ruined. 

Gay Marriage has ALWAYS been about the destruction of the Christian Church.

No where in any of the newspapers, radio programs, cable networks has ANYONE stood up for the Christians. Anyone, who dares speak up and say that the homosexual lifestyle is one of sin and depravity is vilified.  Any Christian Pastor who refuses to back down is being labeled as a bigot, homophobic, hateful, non-inclusive, etc. 

The vitriol from the left and homosexual lobbyists will only intensify until either there is a back lash from BIBLE believing Christians or simply the Churches  quietly surrender.  To those who think that the Christian Churches should, just get along to go along, be nice and all of this insanity will blow over this is just the beginning. Much like dealing with Hitler, appeasement will NOT work, not, with the far left and certainly NOT with the homosexual lobby.   They want to remake mankind in their image.  They want all of mankind to join with them in their perversion or be silent  and dare not mention that the Emperor has no clothes.     

Gay marriage was just the first shot across the bow. The far left and those who desire a One World Government ruled by an untouchable ELITE  have begun open warfare against all Christians.   If 1950 if people were told that homosexuality would be the law of the land in 2015 no one would have believed you.  Well, it is 2015 and I'm telling you now that in less then 25 years Christianity will be outlawed in the United States. 

 It is already illegal to read from certain parts of the BIBLE in the European Union and in Canada.  If a homosexual is offended in Canada they can sue for financial damages. This has happened many times and in every circumstance the homosexual won and the Christian was FORCED by threat of incarceration to pay.  The war against Christians has been going on for some time it is only now that the ELITE have brought it out into the open.

No one living in darkness wants the light shinned upon them. The reason that the Far Left and the homosexual lobby hate Christianity so much is because it is the truth. 

 The word of GOD is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. Hebrews 4:12

Homosexuality has ZERO to do with gay marriage.

Fact 1- Homosexual marriage degrades a time-honored institution

Homosexual marriage is an empty pretense that lacks the fundamental sexual function of a male and female coupling.  And like all counterfeits, it cheapens and degrades the real thing. The destructive effects may not be immediately apparent, but the cumulative damage is inescapable. 

Fact 2 - Homosexual marriage would radically redefine marriage to include virtually any sexual behavior

Once marriage is no longer confined to a man and a woman, and the sole criterion becomes the presence of "love" and "mutual commitment," it is impossible to exclude virtually any "relationship" between two or more partners of either sex. 

To those who scoff at concerns that gay marriage could lead to the acceptance of other harmful and widely-rejected sexual behaviors, it should be pointed out that until very recent times the very suggestion that two women or two men could "marry" would have been greeted with scorn. 

The movement to redefine marriage has already found full expression in what is variously called "polyfidelity" or "polyamory," which seeks to replace traditional marriage with a bewildering array of sexual combinations among various groups of individuals.

Fact 3 - Homosexual marriage is not a civil rights issue

Defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman would not deny homosexuals the basic civil rights accorded other citizens. Nowhere in the Bill of Rights or in any legislation proceeding from it are homosexuals excluded from the rights enjoyed by all citizens--including the right to marry. 

However, no citizen has the unrestricted right to marry whomever they want. A person cannot marry a child, a close blood relative, two or more spouses, or the husband or wife of another person. Such restrictions are based upon the accumulated wisdom not only of Western civilization but also of societies and cultures around the world for millennia. 
 

Fact 4 - Upholding traditional marriage is not "discrimination"

Discrimination occurs when someone is unjustly denied some benefit or opportunity. But it must first be demonstrated that such persons deserve to be treated equally regarding the point in question. For example, FAA and airline regulations rightly discriminate regarding who is allowed into the cockpit of an airplane. 

Those who are not trained pilots have no rightful claim to "discrimination" because they are denied the opportunity to fly an airplane.   Similarly, the accumulated wisdom of thousands of years of human history, as expressed in virtually all cultures, has defined marriage as between a man and a woman.

Fact 5 - Any comparison with interracial marriage is phony

Laws against interracial marriage sought to add a requirement to marriage that is not intrinsic to the institution of marriage. Allowing a black man to marry a white woman, or vice versa, does not change the fundamental definition of marriage, which requires a man and a woman. Homosexual marriage, on the other hand, is the radical attempt to discard this most basic biology.
 

Fact 6 - Homosexual marriage would subject children to unstable home environments

Many homosexuals and their sex partners may sincerely believe they can be good parents. But children are not guinea pigs for grand social experiments in redefining marriage, and should not be placed in settings that are unsuitable for raising children.  

• Transient relationships: While a high percentage of married couples remain married for up to 20 years or longer, with many remaining wedded for life, the vast majority of homosexual relationships are short-lived and transitory. This has nothing to do with alleged "societal oppression." A study in the Netherlands , a gay-tolerant nation that has legalized homosexual marriage, found the average duration of a homosexual relationship to be one and a half years.
• Serial promiscuity: Studies indicate that while three-quarters or more of married couples remain faithful to each other, homosexual couples typically engage in a shocking degree of promiscuity. The same Dutch study found that "committed" homosexual couples have an average of eight sexual partners (outside of the relationship) per year.   Children should not be placed in unstable households with revolving bedroom doors

Fact 7 - Homosexual activists have a political agenda: to radically alter society

Homosexual activists admit that their goal is not simply to make the definition of marriage more "inclusive," but to remake it in their own fallen image. 
 Paula Ettelbrick, former legal director of the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, states, "Being queer means transforming the very fabric of society." 

 

Fact 8 - NOW, victorious, the homosexual agenda will lead to the persecution of those who object on moral or religious grounds

If homosexual marriage becomes the law of the land, then children in public schools will be taught that homosexuality is a normative lifestyle, and that gay households are just another "variant" style of family.  Those who object may find themselves on the wrong side of the law.  Unbelievable?  This Orwellian situation has occurred in Massachusetts , which legalized homosexual marriage in 2004.  In April 2005, David Parker, the parent of a six-year-old boy, protested to the Lexington elementary school after his son was taught about homosexual "families" in his kindergarten class.  

At a scheduled meeting at the school, when Parker refused to back down from his request that the school honor the Massachusetts parental notification statute, he was arrested for "trespassing," handcuffed, and put in jail overnight.  The next morning Parker was led handcuffed into court for his arraignment, and over the next several months endured two subsequent court appearances before the school district backed down and decided to drop all charges against him.  

 In 2007, Parker's lawsuit against the Lexington school officials was dismissed by a federal judge who refused to uphold his civil rights and to enforce the Massachusetts parental notification statute.  Parker's shocking story will become commonplace in a society that forces the acceptance of homosexual marriage as normative. 

FACT 9 - Gay Marriage has NEVER been about homosexuals getting married. It has ALWAYS been about re-engineering society.  Gay Marriage has ALWAYS been about removing from Christian Churches the moral high ground.  By forcing gay marriage upon the American people; those who are seeking to subjugate Christians now have the legal ability to silence the Church. 

FACT 10 -  Homosexuality is an aberration. Homosexuals make up less then 1-3 percent of the population.  Why should all of human history from time immemorial suddenly recognize a biological dead end.  The reproductive organs are designed for reproduction.  The orgasm and sexual attraction is biologically necessary for the continuance of the species.  After all, could you EVER see men and women getting together otherwise?  Homosexuality has nothing to do with gay marriage. 

Information sourced from Timothy J. Dailey:Senior Fellow for Policy at Family Research Council

Destroying the Churches

In a landmark opinion, a divided Supreme Court on Friday ruled that same-sex couples can marry nationwide, establishing a new civil right and handing gay rights advocates a historic victory. 

In the 5-4 ruling, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority with the four liberal justices. Each of the four conservative justices wrote their own dissent.

The entire reason the GAY agenda was forced upon the American people was so that the ELITE who want a one world government could bring down the Christian Churches.  A One World Government where the people have no rights, no socio-ethnic identity, no religious beliefs, no morality this is what the ELITE are working towards. 

In order for the ELITES who are re-engineering the cultural identities of all mankind have begun by erasing the Folkways which  are often referred to as "customs." They are standards of behavior that are socially approved but not morally significant. They are norms for everyday behavior that people follow for the sake of tradition or convenience. Breaking a folkway does not usually have serious consequences. A Folkway is One Man adn One Woman constitute  a marriage, a family unit.

 

Mores
Mores are strict norms that control moral and ethical behavior. Mores are norms based on definitions of right and wrong.  Unlike folkways, mores are morally significant. People feel strongly about them and violating them typically results in disapproval.  Religious Faith is an example of mores. 


Taboos
A taboo is a norm that society holds so strongly that violating it results in extreme disgust. Often times the violator of the taboo is considered unfit to live in that society. Homosexuality has been for thousands of years and still is taboo among normal healthy Heterosexuals.

Laws
A law is a norm that is written down and enforced by an official law enforcement agency.  Since, the ELITES could not persuade most healthy heterosexual people that homosexuality is normal they have resorted to FORCING by the threat of LEGAL punishment normal heterosexual people to accept  homosexuality.

  

All of societies Folkways, Mores, Taboos, and Laws have been manipulated and re-written, and forced upon an unsuspecting public.  None of this is new, this has all happened before. When the Bolsheviks seized control of a Christian Russia they knew that in order to control the populace they would have to destroy the Russian people and then rebuild them in their image.  Stalin took a many tiered  approach, the main 2 being the destruction of the Church followed by the annihilation of the family unit.    A stable society is so because of the strong family unit and a morally upright populace which is normally the influence of religious faith.  In order for Stalin to destroy the family unit he went about setting mother against daughter, father against his own son.  The caveat was that through the public schools the Communist ideology was forced upon the Russian children.  

Then, Stalin went about dismantling the Russian Christian faith.  He did this by closing Churches, making Churches the enemy of the people.   Then, Stalin brought the weight of the Communist government against the Churches. The Christian faith was outlawed in Communist Russia.  All the Churches assets and property was seized by the State.  If a Russian man or woman wanted to work they had to disavow their Christian Faith. If the children wanted to attend higher learning they had to belong to families which did not attend Church.

Once Stalin had robbed children of their parents influence and removed their Christian faith the new generation of Soviet youth would only worship one master the Soviet State. 

 

The ELITES here in America now have the means legally to begin to shut down the Churches.  The gay agenda was always aimed at the destruction of the American Churches.  Just as Stalin seized all the Churches lands and assets in Soviet Union,  the Solicitor General of the United States candidly acknowledged that the tax exemptions of  ANY religious institutions would be in question if they opposed same-sex marriage. 

Christian  Churches could lose their tax-exempt status with the IRS if they refuse to recognize the Supreme Court’s ruling Friday legalizing gay marriage in all 50 states, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts warned in his dissenting opinion.
He cited a comment made months ago by the U.S. government’s top lawyer on the same-sex marriage case.
“Hard questions arise when people of faith exercise religion in ways that may be seen to conflict with the new right to same-sex marriage — when, for example, a religious college provides married student housing only to opposite-sex married couples, or a religious adoption agency declines to place children with same-sex married couples,” Roberts wrote.

“Indeed, the Solicitor General candidly acknowledged that the tax exemptions of some religious institutions would be in question if they opposed same-sex marriage. See Tr. of Oral Arg. on Question 1, at 36–38.

 There is little doubt that these and similar questions will soon be before this Court. Unfortunately, people of faith can take no comfort in the protection of the Constitution of the United States of America. 

TPP Grants Corporations Terrifying Secret Powers

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a proposed regional regulatory and investment treaty. As of 2014, twelve countries throughout the Asia Pacific region have participated in negotiations on the TPP: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States, and Vietnam. If accepted it would be
the largest trade deal in history representing 792 million people and about 40% of the world economy.

The proposed agreement began in 2005 as the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement (TPSEP or P4). Participating countries set the goal of wrapping up negotiations in 2012, but contentious issues such as agriculture, intellectual property, and services and investments have caused negotiations to continue into the present, with the last round meeting in Ottawa from 3–12 July 2014. Implementation of the TPP is one of the primary goals of the trade agenda of the Obama administration in the United States of America.

TPP is about corporations sezing control and ownership of all public lands, waters, oceans etc.  This is a real reason why TPP is being fast tracked, and kept secret from public scrutiny.  The public is not being allowed to read or examine anything that is in the TPP documents for at least 5 years AFTER the treaty is signed. 

The last I checked the United States is a Republic.  America is a nation of people not a collection of corporations who have at their disposal 300 million slaves.   That our leaders of forcing this criminal treaty in secret and behind closed doors speaks volumes as to whom it benefits.  


In  May 2012, United States Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) introduced S. 3225, which would have required the Office of the US Trade Representative to disclose its TPP documents to all members of Congress.  Big surprise, it failed.  In In 2013, even yellow dog Democrats,  Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) and Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) sharply criticised the obama administration's Orwellian  secrecy policies.

TPP in it's entirety places corporations above governments.  An example being  the "Investor State Resolution" clauses that allow foreign companies to sue to overturn national labor and environmental laws. So, if another country doesn't like US labor laws the corporation can sue the federal government and force it to enact unfair labor laws.  Great for the corporation, bad for the already beleaguered American worker who is being squeezed on all sides. 


TPP  gives unprecedented power to the multinational corporations. TPP creates an international tribunal  outside any nation's legal system, that can order compensation for lost expected profits resulting from a nation's regulations. Which, means that if a corporation could make more money by hurting US workers then the US must either give in to this new trade concession or pay, out of the tax payers pocket, the corporation for lost profits.    

Sovereign rights will be conceded, by the signing of the TPP, to foreign corporations and that will be forever.  The wording of TPP makes it so that all who sign will do so in perpetuity. TPP places corporations above governments and places public health, labor laws, or even environmental rules at the behest of the corporation who have NO thought other then to make money.  

The very people of America would become corporate slaves who because of TPP no longer have a say in how our country is run.  Add to that, TPP would allow forigen corporations to have their hand in how the United States is governed and what it's laws will be.

The deal would encourage and reward American corporations for outsourcing even more jobs abroad. And it does nothing to prevent other nations from manipulating their currencies to boost their exports and undermine the competitiveness of U.S.-made products.

The only reason US officials would even think of signing this nightmare partnership is because they are KNOWINGLY laying the foundations for a One World Government.  The TPP hamstrings the United States and signs over sovereignty to foreign interests.  If TPP was so wonderful then why is it being done in secrecy? Why is this administration trying to force this treaty though by fast track?   What is the White House afraid will happen if there is open and honest  transparency?