Autism is NOT a disease

 What is a disease? A disease-label of any kind which has specific symptoms, a label is meant to make you think there is a specific condition.  Is autism a disease with specific condition?

The Answer is no, because the diagnostic test for autism does not exist. No physical test, no blood test, no saliva test, urine test, no brain scan and currently, no genetic assay.  Autism is listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), as basically a list of possible behaviors. There is no defining diagnostic test. 

 
 
So, If a parent applies to the US federal vaccine court, for compensation, because her child was severely damaged by a vaccine, and if she or her doctor calls that damage “autism,” there is almost no chance the government will award her compensation. Because 'Autism' is NOT a disease.


 

Vaccines don’t cause autism because autism does not exist as a treatable condition.  Legally, however, if the parent says her affected child developed “encephalopathy”—a generalized term meaning a condition that adversely affects the structure or function of the brain due to a vaccine then the chances of receiving compensation increase. Can a parent of a neurologically damages child legally purport that a vaccine caused the encephalopathy?  Legally, yes, because the law is all about word games 


Because,  neurological disease-labels in the DSM have no specific and defining diagnostic test(s), the condition, such as, 'Autism' can not legally exist.  Yet, legally if the parent can proves a cause and effect from the vaccine to the neurological damage then the parent has legal grounds for compensation.  
 
 
It is KNOWN legally that vaccine(s) cause brain damage in a certain percentage of children.  This is why Federal law protects pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits by parents who claim that vaccines harmed their children.
The court ruled 6 to 2 that going before a special tribunal set up by Congress is the only way parents can be compensated for the negative side effects that in rare instances.
Isn't is AMAZING that federal regulators(Lawyers) and NOT Doctors are in the decision makers on whether vaccines are safe and properly designed.



Since there is ZERO conclusive evidence for the existence of autism as a specific condition. and there is ZERO defining diagnostic test the child's Parents (Plaintiff) cannot sue the vaccine makers.   However, vaccines cause a laundry list of neurological and brain disorders. Since, it is known that vaccine(s) are the cause of these damages, it the legal term should be labeled as VACCINE DAMAGE, and compensation should be awarded on that basis. 



The US government doesn’t want to admit that vaccines cause severe damage because the legal damages would be in the tens of billions. .So, the US government and the corporate lawyers utilize word games.

 

What, in real world action, causes neurological damage? A blow to the head, a fall, almost drowning in a pool, oxygen deprivation at birth, severe and long-term nutritional deficits, toxic pesticides, toxic medical drugs, and finally vaccines.


The vaccine makers use a shell game of names to disguise the neurological damages caused by vaccines.  Such, as  Fragile X syndrome, Asperger, Rett syndrome; Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, Intellectual Disability, and finally autism(which is NOT an actual disease).
 If the parent plans to seek financial compensation for vaccine damage from the doctors and vaccine makers then it would be best to label the vaccine damage VACCINE DAMAGE, and forgo and allusions to 'Autism.'


This way the Neurological Vaccine Damage can be quantified and qualified by specific group(s) of nerve cells, nerve functions.  Which, cascades into neurological deficiencies resulting physical, sociological, and neurological impairment.

 
 
Corporate researchers funded by vaccine makers claim that vaccines do not cause autism, because there are children diagnosed with autism who have never been vaccinated. That assertion is a hoax. The label and the definition of autism are worthless, to begin with, because there is no specific test that invariably diagnoses autism as it does not exist as a specific disease. 



When a doctor tells a parent, “Your child has autism…”  He’s really stating that the child has suffered  neurological damage. The 'Catch all  label' for vaccine induced neurological damage is Autism.  The  vaccine makers, backed by the US government are legally keeping the parent a parent with a vaccine-damaged child from successfully navigating the vaccine court.  The vaccine court is essentially saying, “If you claim your child was damaged by a vaccine and call that damage autism,  the court will deny monetary compensation. This goes back to the fact that Autism is not a disease listed in the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) by the AMA (American Medical Association) and as such in the court will arbitrarily decided that vaccines can’t cause autism because legally is does not exist. 
 



//jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/04/10/assisted with some info in the article.

Sweden Attacked Yet Again by muslim attacker...leaving only Swedish Victims

 

 

Last week in Stockholm, Sweden 4 people killed and 15 wounded in a truck attack perpetrated by a muslim immigrant. The muslim immigrant is 39-year-old Uzbekistan national Rakhmat Akilov, Rakhmat with murderous forethought drove his truck at high speed directly into a crowded area outside an upscale department store in central Stockholm on Friday. The four people killed included two Swedes, a British man and a Belgian woman.  

 

 

The Swedish police arrested the  man on Friday night after the attack, dragging him from his hijacked beer truck. The 39-year-old Uzbek whose Swedish residency application was rejected last year.  Police said the truck attack suspect was known as a member of islamic extremist organizations. 

 

So, the Swedish police knew that Rakhmat Akilov, a muslim extremist hates the west, hates Democracy, and hates the Swedish people.  So, instead of removing him and all those like him (muslim extremist) from Sweden the Prime Minister of Sweden gives a meaningless statement...Prime Minister Stefan Lofven said "the whole of Sweden" sympathized with the families and friends of the victims."  He might as well as said nothing. Why is it that the Swedish people do not wake up to the fact that they are in mortal  danger.  In 2015, a record 163,000 asylum-seekers arrived in the country; the highest per capita rate in Europe.  

 

 

When the birth rate of muslims in Sweden exceed the birth rate of natural Swedes it is only an inevitability that muslims will seize control of the Swedish govermment through sheer numbers at the voting booth.  Then, Sweden the once...'Most peaceful country in Europe' will be nothing but a memory.  

 

The US Dollar

The United States F35 Boondoggle

 

There are literally hundreds of critical performance deficiencies and maintenance problems for the USA's F35 fighter program.  It is believed that the F-35A's ability to succeed either as an air-to-air or an air-to-ground fighter is very low.

In an analysis of the report at the Straus Military Reform Project, list the following factors:

The problem with the wing design leaves the F-35 a challenge to fly at around the speed of sound: “All F-35 variants display objectionable or unacceptable flying qualities at transonic speeds, where aerodynamic forces on the aircraft are rapidly changing. Particularly, under elevated 'g' conditions, when wing loading causes the effects to be more pronounced, pilots have reported the flying qualities as extremely poor.

Further more the Electro-Optical Targeting System suffers from low resolution and short range. Which, means if pilots are trying to single out a ground target, they have to fly far to close to be able to deploy guided munitions. This eliminates stealth approach opening the pilot to ground fire. 

 

To over come the loss of stealth the use of the F35 cannon is recommended by manufacture.  The problem is currently the cannon does NOT work. 

To maintain its sleek radar profile, the F-35A has a door to conceal the gun.  Good idea, bad execution, because if the F35 open's it's cannon doors the wind drag forces the F35 out of it's flight path.  The developers say this is a software problem, the pilots say its a hardware issue.

 

 The F-35's software is a nightmare of code failures and patchwork. The most current F35 version, the December Block 3FR6 release, has MAJOR software issues, which could take a decade or more to iron out. . Add to that the cannon sighting problem, the “Air-to-Air Range Infrastructure” remains woefully behind schedule.

Even if the cannon were somehow usable, it's not much help in a ground support mission, because the F-35s can only load up with a couple of hundred rounds barely enough for 2-3 ground targets at best.

Flight testing “continues to be a source of significant flight failures. Most embarrassingly for the manufacturer there are fatigue problems in the tail; the arresting gear on the F-35A variant is good for one landing only (DID you get that the F35 which costs 110 MILLION per plane can only land once then must be repaired) 

Then, the F-35A and F-35C show excessively high air flow temperatures around the engine; and the horizontal tail overheats in a Mach 1.5 run, which is totally unacceptable for a 5th generation fighter.

 

The F-35C is also problematic when launched from an aircraft carrier: “Vertical oscillations during F-35C catapult launches were reported by pilots as excessive, violent, causing major physical discomfort to the pilots. 

 

DEA are Criminals with a Badge

The Drug Enforcement Administration takes billions of dollars in cash from people who are never charged with criminal activity, according to a report issued today by the Justice Department’s Inspector General.

  

Since 2007, the report found, the DEA has seized more than $4 billion in cash from people suspected of involvement with the drug trade. But 81 percent of those seizures, totaling $3.2 billion, were conducted administratively, meaning no civil or criminal charges were brought against the owners of the cash and no judicial review of the seizures ever occurred.

 

That total does not include the dollar value of other seized assets, like cars, homes, electronics and clothing.
These seizures are all legal under the controversial practice of civil asset forfeiture, which allows authorities to take cash, contraband and property from people suspected of crime. But the practice does not require authorities to obtain a criminal conviction, and it allows departments to keep seized cash and property for themselves unless individuals successfully challenge the forfeiture in court. Critics across the political spectrum say this creates a perverse profit motive, incentivizing police to seize goods not for the purpose of fighting crime, but for padding department budgets.

In the absence of this information, the report examined 100 DEA cash seizures that occurred “without a court-issued warrant and without the presence of narcotics, the latter of which would provide strong evidence of related criminal behavior.”

 

Fewer than half of those seizures were related to a new or ongoing criminal investigation, or led to an arrest or prosecution, the Inspector General found.
“When seizure and administrative forfeitures do not ultimately advance an investigation or prosecution,” the report concludes, “law enforcement creates the appearance, and risks the reality, that it is more interested in seizing and forfeiting cash than advancing an investigation or prosecution.”

 

The scope of asset forfeiture is staggering. Since 2007 the Department of Justice’s Asset Forfeiture Fund, which collects proceeds from seized cash and other property, has ballooned to $28 billion. In 2014 alone authorities seized $5 billion in cash and property from people — greater than the value of all documented losses to burglary that year.

Some of the encounters were based on tips from confidential sources working in the travel industry, a number of whom have received large sums of money in exchange for their cooperation. In one case, officers targeted an individual for questioning on a tip from a travel industry informant that the individual had paid for a plane ticket with a pre-paid debit card and cash.

White Farmers Being Slaughtered in South Africa

WHITE GENOCIDE IN SOUTH AFRICA

LAST month, British woman Sue Howarth and her husband Robert Lynn were woken at 2am by three men breaking into a window of their remote farm in Dullstroom, a small town in the northeast of South Africa, about 240km from the nearest capital city.

The couple, who had lived in the area for 20 years, were tied up, stabbed, and tortured with a blowtorch for several hours. The masked men stuffed a plastic bag down Mrs Howarth’s throat, and attempted to strangle her husband with a bag around his neck.

The couple were bundled into their own truck, still in their pyjamas, and driven to a roadside where they were shot. Mrs Howarth, 64, a former pharmaceutical company executive, was shot twice in the head. Mr Lynn, 66, was shot in the neck.

Miraculously he survived, and managed to flag down a passer-by early on Sunday morning. Mrs Howarth, who police said was “unrecognizable” from her injuries, had multiple skull fractures, gunshot wounds and “horrific” burns to her breasts.

“Sue was discovered amongst some trees, lying in a ditch,” writes Jana Boshoff, reporter for the local Middelburg Observer newspaper. “Her rescuers managed to find her by following her groans of pain and then noticing drag marks from the road into the field.

“Her head was covered with a towel. Her eyes were swollen shut. She was partially clothed with just scraps of her shirt remaining. Her breasts and upper body was bloody. The plastic bag, shoved down her throat, took some effort to remove because her jaw was clamped down tightly.

 

“How she managed to breathe with the bag in her throat remains a mystery. One of her rescuers later recalled how Sue was unresponsive except for the constant groaning. Whilst the man ran back to the road to see if an ambulance has not arrived yet, she managed to curl one of her arms around her breasts in a last attempt to protect herself.”

She was rushed to hospital and placed on life support, but died two days later.

 

This is happening on a daily basis in South Africa to white farmers. It is being done deliberately with forethought because the South African government sanctions the torture and murder of white farmers. There have been more than 70 attacks and around 25 murders in similar attacks on white farmers in months time. 

 

The Transvaal Agricultural Union, which represents commercial farmers, and civil rights group AfriForum.

 

According to the TAU, last year there were 345 attacks resulting in 70 deaths — the highest death toll since 2008. In 2015 there were 318 attacks resulting in 64 deaths, and the year before there were 277 attacks resulting in 67 deaths.

 

In total, between 1998 and the end of 2016, 1848 people have been murdered in farm attacks — 1187 farmers, 490 family members, 147 farm employees, and 24 people who happened to be visiting the farm at the time.

The rise in farm attacks has been blamed on increasingly anti-white hate speech, particularly from the ruling African National Congress.

 

Trying to STOP the repeal the Federal Communications Commission’s 2016 broadband privacy rules

 

Last week, on a party-line vote, the Senate voted to repeal the Federal Communications Commission’s 2016 broadband privacy rules giving consumers the power to choose how their ISPs use and share their personal data. Today, the House of Representatives will vote, and if the House also votes to repeal the rules, the bill will go to President Trump, who is expected to sign it.

The stark consequences of repeal are Orwellian: ISPs like Comcast, AT&T, and Charter WILL sell your personal information to the highest bidder. All of your personal search history, the web pages you visit, every video you watch, all of it will be the property of a corporation.  You will no longer have no say over your personal data and to whom it is sold. No one, not your Congressmen, not your Senator, not even the president will be able to protect you. 

 

The Federal Trade Commission has no legal authority to oversee ISP practices, and the bill under consideration will permanently cripple the FCC by denying it the future ability to overturn such legislation.  So, unless the bill fails, highly unlikely due to politicians being bought off by the ISP's, the nation’s strongest privacy protections will not only be eliminated, but they will be unable to be revived by the FCC.

How to stop the Draconian take over of YOUR Online Data

The life and eath struggle of American's Internet freedom is not yet lost. The House votes today! Stand up!  Tell, yell, shout, send smoke signals, faxes, telegrams, emails, phone calls, do ANYTHING to get YOUR Representatives attention.  Don’t let the Fascist Corporations rob American's of OUR hard-won protections.  

 Color of Change, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Free Press have simple ways for YOU to inform your Representative what YOU think of the FCC’s rules and Congress’ efforts to eliminate them.